Optimal Planning of Distributed Energy Storage Systems in Active Distribution Networks Embedding Grid Reconfiguration
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we present a procedure for the optimal siting and sizing of energy storage systems (ESSs) owned, and directly controlled by network operators of active distribution networks. The peculiarity of the proposed planning procedure consists in embedding the grid reconfiguration. We use a recently proposed conditionally exact convex optimal power flow (OPF) as the core of the optimization model. We appropriately model the objective function to include both technical and economic aspects, while keeping the exactness of the relaxed convex OPF. In particular, the proposed procedure accounts for the minimization of: voltage-magnitude deviations, feeders'/lines' congestion, cost of supplying loads, and investment costs related to the ESSs. In addition, the seasonal configurations of the grid are determined based on 1) network security constraints, and 2) the minimum resistive losses. The stochasticity of loads and renewable productions are also taken into account. We suitably modeled the ESSs to consider their ability to support the network by both active and reactive powers. Two test cases are used to demonstrate, and quantify, the capabilities of the proposed procedure for providing optimal and feasible solutions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Numerous examples of customer-owned distributed (behind-the-metre) energy storage devices are documented in the literature.
“Numerous examples of customer-owned distributed (behind the metre) ES devices are documented in references [51][52][53][54].”
From Voltage Regulation in Rooftop PV-Rich Distribution Networks: A Review and Detailed Case Study (2026) · cites this paper as [54]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Voltage Regulation in Rooftop PV-Rich Distribution Networks: A Review and Detailed Case Study
Rahman, O., Elphick, S., & Robinson, D. A. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15051074 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nick, M., Cherkaoui, R., & Paolone, M.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1577-1590
- ISSN
- 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0679
- OpenAlex
- W2741476311
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 8.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- infoscience.epfl.ch
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems (publishedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Keywords
- distributed energy storage, active distribution networks, grid reconfiguration, energy storage siting and sizing, voltage deviation minimization, investment cost minimization, network security constraints, ohmic losses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review