Cited by 154Integrated Energy Systems OptimizationElectric Power System OptimizationPower System Reliability and Maintenance

Probabilistic Flexibility Evaluation for Power System Planning Considering Its Association With Renewable Power Curtailment

Lu, Zongxiang, Li, Haibo, Qiao, Ying·2018·IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Abstract

Taking advantage of various flexible resources to reduce or even eliminate renewable energy (RE) curtailment is an important issue in the operational planning of future power systems. Building a highly compatible flexibility evaluation method that incorporates a clear relation between flexibility indices and RE curtailment is crucial to addressing this issue. A novel flexibility evaluation methodology is proposed based on the probabilistic distribution of flexibility adequacy. The novel indices can reflect the direction, amount, frequency, and consequence of lack of flexibility and also have a linear relationship with RE curtailment, features that are beneficial for planners aiming to determine the type of flexible resources needed and to quantify their capacity. The conditional probability distribution functions of different types of flexible resources are first built. Then, a unified form of flexibility on different time-scales is proposed to represent and calculate their contributions to flexible indices using conditional probability convolution. The evaluation method is validated in a combined heat-and-electricity supply system. Four types of flexible resources are studied to demonstrate the quantitative capability of the proposed method in planning, including conventional units, electricity storage devices, heat storage devices, and electric boilers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2810091

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AFA evaluates the overall capability to meet flexibility requirements.

    “Inspired by literature [35], this article proposes three complementary flexibility assessment metrics for FCSs with PV and energy storage: AFA evaluates the overall capability to meet flexibility requirements, EFNS quantifies potential deficits in flexibility provision, and EDFA specifically measures the contribution of V2G services, collectively enabling comprehensive assessment from system-wide”
  • EDFA measures the contribution of V2G services.

    “Inspired by literature [35], this article proposes three complementary flexibility assessment metrics for FCSs with PV and energy storage: AFA evaluates the overall capability to meet flexibility requirements, EFNS quantifies potential deficits in flexibility provision, and EDFA specifically measures the contribution of V2G services, collectively enabling comprehensive assessment from system-wide”
  • EFNS quantifies potential deficits in flexibility provision.

    “Inspired by literature [35], this article proposes three complementary flexibility assessment metrics for FCSs with PV and energy storage: AFA evaluates the overall capability to meet flexibility requirements, EFNS quantifies potential deficits in flexibility provision, and EDFA specifically measures the contribution of V2G services, collectively enabling comprehensive assessment from system-wide”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, Z., Li, H., & Qiao, Y.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Tsinghua Sichuan Energy Internet Research Institute (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Published
2018-05
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
3285-3295
ISSN
  • 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0679
OpenAlex
W2792053552
Cited by
154
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB0900100)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51677099, U1766201)
  • State Grid Corporation Science and Technology Project (SGGSKY00FJJS1600209)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Power System Reliability and Maintenance
Keywords
renewable energy curtailment, power system planning, conditional distributions, flexible resources, electricity storage, thermal energy storage, electric boilers, combined heat and power

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review