CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1Optimal Power Flow DistributionElectric Power System OptimizationSmart Grid Energy Management

Chance constrained day-ahead robust flexibility needs assessment for low voltage distribution network

Open access
Hashmi, Md Umar, Koirala, Arpan, Ergun, Hakan, Van Hertem, Dirk·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2207.10234arXiv 2207.10234
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

For market-based procurement of low voltage (LV) flexibility, DSOs identify the amount of flexibility needed for resolving probable distribution network (DN) voltage and thermal congestion. A framework is required to avoid over or under procurement of flexibility in the presence of uncertainty. To this end, we propose a scenario-based robust chance-constrained (CC) day-ahead flexibility needs assessment (FNA) framework. The CC level is analogous to the risk DSO is willing to take in flexibility planning. Multi-period optimal power flow is performed to calculate the amount of flexibility needed to avoid network issues. Flexibility is defined in terms of nodal power ramp-up and ramp-down and cumulative energy needs over a full day for each node. Future uncertainties are considered as multiple scenarios generated using multivariate Gaussian distribution and Cholesky decomposition. These scenarios are utilized to solve the flexibility needs assessment optimal power flow (FNA-OPF) problem. Zonal clustering of an LV feeder is performed using electrical distance as a measure and spatial partitioning. The FNA tool calculates ramp-up and ramp-down flexibility's power and energy requirements. Energy and power needs are often valued differently in many energy markets. We identify the marginal value of flexibility associated with energy and power needs separately. From numerical results for an LV feeder, it is observed that zonal flexibility needs assessment is more immune to uncertainty than nodal flexibility needs, making it more useful for DSOs to evaluate day-ahead flexibility procurement. We also propose a Pareto optimal mechanism for selecting CC level to reduce flexibility needs while reducing DN congestion.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper proposes a scenario-based robust chance-constrained day-ahead flexibility needs assessment framework for low-voltage distribution networks, using multi-period optimal power flow to quantify nodal and zonal ramp-up/ramp-down power and energy needs under uncertainty. It finds that zonal aggregation reduces uncertainty exposure and that a 5% chance-constraint level is Pareto optimal for the studied feeder.

Key findings

  • Zonal flexibility needs are less sensitive to uncertainty than nodal needs: standard deviation falls by 43.48% for ramp-up and 57.85% for ramp-down flexibility needs when aggregated into zones.
  • With a 5% chance-constraint level, mean under-voltage probability drops from 6.165% with no flexibility to 0.076% (98.77% reduction); over-voltage probability falls by 84.2%, thermal overload probability by 77.9%, and mean hours of congestion by 93.23%.
  • The Pareto optimal chance-constraint level for the studied network is 5%.
  • Power flexibility is valued more than energy flexibility: the marginal increase in the FNA-OPF objective is more than 487% for a 60% reduction in flexibility power ranges, compared with around 186% for up to an 80% reduction in daily energy constraints; power needs are described as twice as important as energy needs.

Methods

  • Scenario generation uses a multivariate Gaussian distribution and Cholesky decomposition, taking point forecasts and forecast errors as inputs; 1000 scenarios are generated for load and PV, with assumed forecast errors of 30% for nodal load and 40% for PV generation.
  • Flexibility needs are computed via a multi-period optimal power flow problem, FNA-OPF, which minimizes the cost of curtailed load and generation and calculates nodal ramp-up/ramp-down power and energy needs; robust chance-constrained needs are derived from the empirical cumulative distribution function of scenario results.
  • Zonal clustering uses electrical distance based on line admittance, spectral partitioning via a doubly stochastic matrix, k-means clustering, and silhouette score to select the number of zones; the case study uses an adapted Spanish LV feeder with 76 nodes, 75 branches, 52 loads in 28 nodes, total daily load of 2.719 MWh, and 338 kW peak PV, solved with PowerModels.jl/JuMP and IPOPT.

Limitations

  • The paper states that due to German data limitations, only historical forecast errors and point forecasts were available, leading to a simple scenario generation model; it also states that the scenario generation does not consider spatial correlation, although DG scenarios are assumed identical across the feeder based on geographical proximity, and extreme tail events are ignored.
  • The paper states that FNA-OPF is nonconvex and solved with IPOPT, that only 57.03% of optimal power flow calculations were feasible for all time steps using an iteration limit of 3000, and that solutions with extreme tightening of flexibility bounds are unreliable because no solution may be possible or the maximum number of iterations may be reached.
  • Evident from the text: results are based on a single adapted Spanish LV feeder and a specific load/PV profile, so the reported numerical values and the 5% Pareto-optimal chance-constraint level may not generalize; the paper also notes future work on using the needs assessment for market bid selection, indicating that procurement strategy is not yet developed.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2207.10234

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

11 of 26 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § B. Temporal and spatially correlated scenarios · p. 7

    The average spread of 160 Spanish feeders is a square of size of 158 meters.

    “The average spread of 160 Spanish feeders, [37], is a square of size of 158 meters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] [37] A. Koirala, L. Suárez-Ramón, B. Mohamed, and P. Arboleya, 'Non-synthetic european low voltage test system,' International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 118, p. 105712, 2020. - source

      Section 3.2.4 reports 161 feeders in the case study, close to the cited count of 160. Our copy does not report an average geographic spread or a 158-meter square; searches for those dimensions found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 19

    The aggregation of uncertain parameters leads to a reduction in variance of uncertainty.

    “The aggregation of uncertain parameters leads to the reduction in variance of uncertainty is a well known concept [54].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [54] [54] J. Miettinen, H. Holttinen, and B.-M. Hodge, 'Simulating wind power forecast error distributions for spatially aggregated wind power plants,' Wind Energy, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 45-62, 2020. - source

      Section 5.3 reports that aggregating more wind-power sites produces narrower distributions and reduces uncertainty. The paper supports this for spatially aggregated wind-power forecasts, but not the unrestricted claim that aggregating uncertain parameters generally reduces their variance. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data
    § Abstract · p. 1

    Zonal flexibility needs assessment is more immune to uncertainty than nodal flexibility needs.

    “From numerical results for an LV feeder, it is observed that zonal flexibility needs assessment is more immune to uncertainty than nodal flexibility needs, making it more useful for DSOs to evaluate day-ahead flexibility procurement.”
    • Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4 · plain
      “Numerically, it is observed that variance of the day-ahead FNA can be reduced by zonal aggregation of flexibility needs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § B. Metrics for day-ahead FNA · p. 12

    The temporal distribution of ramp up and ramp down power needs will often have a fat-tailed distribution.

    “the temporal distribution of ramp up and ramp down power needs will often have a fat-tailed distribution, as shown in Fig. 3.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 5

    For the DN, power needs are twice as important as the energy needs.

    “It is observed that for the DN, power needs are twice as important as the energy needs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
  • May combine two claims. 17

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A. Distance measure for clustering · p. 9

    A power network can be clustered based on static network parameters such as line impedance/admittance or dynamic parameters such as power flows, line losses, voltage variations.

    “A power network can be clustered based on static network parameters such as line impedance/admittance or dynamic parameters such as power flows, line losses, voltage variations [12], [26], [39].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] [12] M. Zhang, Z. Miao, and L. Fan, 'Power grid partitioning: Static and dynamic approaches,' in 2018 North American Power Symposium (NAPS). IEEE, 2018, pp. 1-6. - source
    • cites [26] [26] R. J. Sánchez-García, M. Fennelly, S. Norris, N. Wright, G. Niblo, J. Brodzki, and J. W. Bialek, 'Hierarchical spectral clustering of power grids,' IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 2229-2237, 2014. - source

      The “Weights in Power Grids” section distinguishes static line-admittance weights from dynamic power-flow weights and describes clustering using both. It does not identify line losses or voltage variations as clustering parameters, so those examples are not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [39] [39] E. Cotilla-Sanchez, P. D. Hines, C. Barrows, S. Blumsack, and M. Patel, 'Multi-attribute partitioning of power networks based on electrical distance,' IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4979-4987, 2013. - source

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § III. IDENTIFYING ZONES OF A LV DN · p. 9

    In the UK, there are more than 1.3 million LV feeders.

    “For example, in the UK, there are more than 1.3 million LV feeders [38].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] [38] V. Rigoni, L. F. Ochoa, G. Chicco, A. Navarro-Espinosa, and T. Gozel, 'Representative residential lv feeders: A case study for the north west of england,' IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 348-360, 2015. - source

      The available passages labeled Abstract contain bibliographic information, not a UK-wide feeder count. Searches for “1.3 million LV feeders” and “number of low voltage feeders in the UK” found no passage addressing the claimed figure. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § B. Spectral partitioning · p. 10

    For the transformed doubly stochastic matrix, all eigenvalues are real and smaller than or equal to 1, with one eigenvalue exactly equal to 1.

    “For this transformed matrix, all eigenvalues are real and smaller than or equal to 1, with one eigenvalue exactly equal to 1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] [41] B. Mourad, 'On a spectral property of doubly stochastic matrices and its application to their inverse eigenvalue problem,' Linear algebra and its applications, vol. 436, no. 9, pp. 3400-3412, 2012. - source

      The Introduction (page unavailable in our copy) states that a doubly stochastic matrix has an eigenvalue of 1 and that every eigenvalue has modulus at most 1. It does not say all eigenvalues are real; Theorem 3.3 in §3, Applications (page unavailable), gives a doubly stochastic matrix with potentially nonreal eigenvalues. The cited paper therefore supports the eigenvalue bound and the eigenvalue at 1, but not the claim that all eigenvalues of the transformed matrix are real. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § IV. DAY-AHEAD FLEXIBILITY PLANNING · p. 11

    Depending on the application of flexibility, flexible resources needs can be measured in terms of response speed (or ramp rate), duration (or energy) and direction (ramp up and ramp down power).

    “Depending on the application of flexibility, flexible resources needs can be measured in terms of response speed (or ramp rate), duration (or energy) and direction (ramp up and ramp down power) [44].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] [44] H. Tang and S. Wang, 'Energy flexibility quantification of grid-responsive buildings: Energy flexibility index and assessment of their effectiveness for applications,' Energy, vol. 221, p. 119756, 2021. - source

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A. Flexibility: definition · p. 11

    Ramp up flexibility can be provided by consumer loads such as HVAC, water heaters, pool pumps.

    “Ramp up flexibility can be provided by consumer loads such as HVAC, water heaters, pool pumps [47] etc.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] [47] Y. Chen, M. U. Hashmi, J. Mathias, A. Buši´ c, and S. Meyn, 'Distributed control design for balancing the grid using flexible loads,' in Energy Markets and Responsive Grids. Springer, 2018, pp. 383-411. - source

      The available passage from the paper (section and page not identified) says flexible consumer loads can provide grid-balancing services and discusses renewable-generation ramps. It does not identify HVAC, water heaters, or pool pumps, or specifically establish ramp-up flexibility from those loads. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A. System description · p. 16

    The DN considered is an adaptation of one of the Spanish LV feeders described in [37].

    “The DN considered is an adaptation of one of the Spanish LV feeders described in [37].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] [37] A. Koirala, L. Suárez-Ramón, B. Mohamed, and P. Arboleya, 'Non-synthetic european low voltage test system,' International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 118, p. 105712, 2020. - source

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § C. Case study 2: Marginal value of energy and power · p. 21

    Flexible resources are valued differently in different types of markets.

    “Flexible resources are valued differently in different types of markets [55].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [55] [55] M. U. Hashmi, W. Labidi, A. Buši´ c, S.-E. Elayoubi, and T. Chahed, 'Long-term revenue estimation for battery performing arbitrage and ancillary services,' in IEEE Int. Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm). IEEE, 2018, pp. 1-7. source

      The indexed passages contain a HAL record and abstract, but no section or page from the paper’s full text. Searches for the relative value of flexible resources in different markets and for arbitrage versus ancillary services found no full-text passage on which to base a verdict. (LLM, conf=0.70)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A. Distance measure for clustering · p. 9

    The electrical distance matrix is used for partitioning LV DNs in prior works.

    “The electrical distance matrix is used for partitioning LV DNs in [25], [26].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [25] [25] S. Blumsack, P. Hines, M. Patel, C. Barrows, and E. C. Sanchez, 'Defining power network zones from measures of electrical distance,' in 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting. IEEE, 2009, pp. 1-8. - source
    • cites [26] [26] R. J. Sánchez-García, M. Fennelly, S. Norris, N. Wright, G. Niblo, J. Brodzki, and J. W. Bialek, 'Hierarchical spectral clustering of power grids,' IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 2229-2237, 2014. - source

      The Introduction says electrical distance between nodes is used to define zones when partitioning power networks. But the paper studies transmission-grid test systems, not low-voltage distribution networks, and its own partitioning method uses spectral distance rather than an electrical distance matrix. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Optimization formulation · p. 13

    FNA-OPF is an adaptation of the resource dispatch tool introduced in [50].

    “FNA-OPF is an adaptation of the resource dispatch tool introduced in [50].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] [50] M. U. Hashmi, A. Koirala, H. Ergun, and D. Van Hertem, 'Flexible and curtailable resource activation in a distribution network using nodal sensitivities,' in 2021 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1-6. - source

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § A. System description · p. 16

    The load perturbations are reduced during aggregation at the substation, while PV generation leads to significantly high fluctuations during the day due to high simultaneity factor.

    “Note from Fig. 4, that the load perturbations are reduced during aggregation at the substation, however, PV generation due to high simultaneity factor leads to significantly high fluctuations during the day.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 18

    The error between inverse ECDF and quantile of approximate normal distribution fit is 0.33% and 0.02% respectively.

    “The error between inverse ECDF and quantile of approximate normal distribution fit is 0.33% and 0.02% respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The distribution of flexibility needs of a distribution network is not known.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § C. Case study 2: Marginal value of energy and power · p. 22

    Similar trends can be observed for other combinations of simultaneous tightening of power and energy constraints.

    “Similar trends can be observed for other combinations of simultaneous tightening of power and energy constraints.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 18

    The error between FNA calculated by applying chance constraint level on the inverse ECDF and on an approximate Gaussian fit is less than 1% for most points, but few instances had an error exceeding 5%.

    “From the numerical results we observed that the error between FNA calculated by applying chance constraint level on the inverse ECDF and on an approximate Gaussian fit is less than 1% for most points, however, few instances had an error exceeding 5%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The distribution of flexibility needs of a distribution network is not known.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 19

    In the numerical example, mean ramp up and down needs are around 9.2% and 12.1% respectively.

    “In our numerical example, mean ramp up and down needs are around 9.2% and 12.1% respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 20

    The mean over-voltage probability is reduced by 84.2% and thermal over-load probability is reduced by 77.9%.

    “The mean over-voltage probability is reduced by 84.2% and thermal over-load probability is reduced by 77.9%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 18

    These zones are located at the end of the distribution feeder.

    “Note that these zones are located at the end of the distribution feeder.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 19

    Zonal flexibility needs have an STD which is 43.48% and 57.85% less for ramp up and down nodal flexibility needs.

    “We observe that in this numerical case study that the zonal fl exibility needs have an STD which is 43 . 48% and 57 . 85% less for ramp up and down nodal fl exibility needs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 20

    Choosing εcc = 5% can reduce ramp up energy needs by 68% and ramp down energy needs by 40%.

    “Choosing ϵ cc = 5% can reduce ramp up energy needs by 68% and ramp down energy needs 40%, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 19

    A significant amount of ramp up and ramp down flexibility is needed for the DN, with network issues less than 10% of the time.

    “Table I shows that a significant amount of ramp up and ramp down flexibility is needed for DN, with network issues less than 10% of the time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Temporal and spatially correlated scenarios · p. 7

    Using a forecast error of 1.96 times the standard deviation would ensure that more than 95% of the incidents are covered.

    “This would ensure that more than 95% of the incidents are covered.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The forecast error is 1.96 times the standard deviation of the normal distribution.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § III. IDENTIFYING ZONES OF A LV DN · p. 9

    Identifying the zones of a LV DN will help the DSO in planning the flexibility needs of a network.

    “Identifying the zones of a LV DN will help the DSO in planning the flexibility needs of a network.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4

    These values of flexibility needs will be robust in true sense.

    “These values of flexibility needs will be robust in true sense.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § B. Temporal and spatially correlated scenarios · p. 7

    The generated scenarios do not ignore spatial correlation entirely.

    “However, the generated scenarios do not ignore spatial correlation entirely.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § A. System description · p. 16

    A high silhouette score implies that nodes in a cluster are strongly related to each other and weakly related to other nodes in other clusters.

    “The high silhouette score implies the nodes in a cluster are strongly related to each other and weakly related to other nodes in the other clusters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § C. Robust FNA under uncertainty · p. 14

    Robust optimization is a two-stage optimization problem where the inner level minimizes the objective function and the outer level maximizes the inner-optimization within an uncertainty set.

    “Robust optimization is a two-stage optimization problem where the inner level minimizes the objective function and the outer level maximizes the inner-optimization within an uncertainty set [22]-[24], [29].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [22] [22] A. J. Conejo and X. Wu, 'Robust optimization in power systems: a tutorial overview,' Optimization and Engineering, pp. 1-23, 2021. - source
    • cites [23] [23] L. Baringo and A. J. Conejo, 'Offering strategy via robust optimization,' IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1418-1425, 2010. - source
    • cites [24] [24] D. Bertsimas and A. Thiele, 'Robust and data-driven optimization: modern decision making under uncertainty,' in Models, methods, and applications for innovative decision making. INFORMS, 2006, pp. 95-122. - source
    • cites [29] [29] A. Ben-Tal and A. Nemirovski, 'Robust optimization-methodology and applications,' Mathematical programming, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 453-480, 2002. - source

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 18

    The participation of flexible resources in a flexibility market can create an additional revenue stream for prosumers and can alleviate the locational disparity.

    “The participation of flexible resources in such a market can create an additional revenue stream for such prosumers and can alleviate the locational disparity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § A. System description · p. 16

    The FNA-OPF problem is nonconvex.

    “Since the FNA-OPF problem is nonconvex, therefore, IPOPT solver [53] is utilized to solve (7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § C. Goodness of a cluster · p. 10

    The silhouette coefficient of a node is a confidence indicator of its association in a group.

    “The silhouette coefficient of a node is a confidence indicator of its association in a group M x [27], [42].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [27] [27] J. Ding, Q. Zhang, S. Hu, Q. Wang, and Q. Ye, 'Clusters partition and zonal voltage regulation for distribution networks with high penetration of pvs,' IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 6041-6051, 2018. - source
    • cites [42] [42] F. Scarlatache, G. Grigora¸ s, G. Chicco, and G. Câr¸ tin˘ a, 'Using k-means clustering method in determination of the optimal placement of distributed generation sources in electrical distribution systems,' in 2012 13th International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM). IEEE, 2012, pp. 953-958. - source

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § B. Metrics for day-ahead FNA · p. 12

    Pareto optimality is frequently used to select between conflicting goals of a multi-objective optimization problem.

    “Pareto optimality is frequently used to select between conflicting goals of a multi-objective optimization problem [49].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] [49] K. Deb and H. Gupta, 'Searching for robust pareto-optimal solutions in multi-objective optimization,' in International conference on evolutionary multi-criterion optimization. Springer, 2005, pp. 150-164. - source

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 20

    The CC level can be used for identifying the criticality of a resource in ensuring DN reliability.

    “The CC level can also be used for identifying the criticality of a resource in ensuring DN reliability, as shown in the next section.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 20

    The CC levels are analogous to the risk DSOs are willing to take while planning for DN flexibility in a day-ahead setting.

    “The CC levels are analogous to the risk DSOs are willing to take while planning for DN flexibility in a day-ahead setting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 19

    With growing DG integration, the need for flexibility planning will be crucial for maintaining the reliability of the DN.

    “With growing DG integration, the need for flexibility planning will be crucial for maintaining the reliability of DN.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § VII. CONCLUSION · p. 23

    The FNA-OPF identifies nodal ramp up and ramp down power and energy needs of a distribution network, which minimizes the cost of dispatching flexible resources.

    “The FNA-OPF identifies nodal ramp up and ramp down power and energy needs of a distribution network, which minimizes the cost of dispatching flexible resources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § APPENDIX · p. 27

    The selection of the best number of zones that increases the mean silhouette score is a design problem.

    “Note SC k T may be high for a small number of clusters which may not suit the application, therefore, the selection of best k which increases SC k T , is a design problem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § B. Metrics for day-ahead FNA · p. 12

    The limits on ramp up and down power and energy needs are infrastructure constraints that the optimization needs to take into account.

    “The limits on ramp up and down power and energy needs are infrastructure constraints that the optimization needs to take into account.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A. Flexibility: definition · p. 11

    Prosumer energy storage if not fully charged or discharged can provide both ramp up and ramp down flexibility.

    “Prosumer energy storage if not fully charged or discharged can provide both ramp up and ramp down flexibility [48].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] [48] A. Buši´ c, M. U. Hashmi, and S. Meyn, 'Distributed control of a fleet of batteries,' in 2017 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, 2017, pp. 3406-3411. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4

    The proposed framework for zonal clustering partitions the DN in connected segments, a key challenge in other partitioning methods.

    “The proposed framework for zonal clustering partitions the DN in connected segments, a key challenge in other partitioning methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § C. Case study 2: Marginal value of energy and power · p. 22

    The levels of power and energy bounds tightening are limited to 0.6 and 0.8 respectively, as the majority of points are infeasible for any further tightening.

    “Note that we limit the levels of power and energy bounds tightening to 0.6 and 0.8 respectively, as the majority of points are infeasible for any further tightening.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § VII. CONCLUSION · p. 23

    Power system flexibility will be crucial for reliable operation of distribution network for ensuring a large scale integration of distributed generation and new loads such as electric vehicle.

    “Power system flexibility will be crucial for reliable operation of distribution network for ensuring a large scale integration of distributed generation and new loads such as electric vehicle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § B. Case study 1: Flexibility needs assessment · p. 18

    The locational disparity of prosumers can be reduced by implementing a flexibility market.

    “The locational disparity of prosumers can be reduced by implementing a flexibility market.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § A. System description · p. 16

    Thermal overload is calculated by performing OPF with relaxed network constraints, as OPF output for infeasible cases are not reliable.

    “Thermal overload is calculated by performing OPF with relaxed network constraints, as OPF output for infeasible cases are not reliable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § II. SCENARIO GENERATION · p. 6

    The generated scenarios using multivariate Gaussian distribution and Cholesky decomposition considers correlation of data points and parameter distribution.

    “The generated scenarios using multivariate Gaussian distribution and Cholesky decomposition considers (a) correlation of data points, (b) parameter distribution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A. Multivariate distribution and Cholesky decomposition · p. 6

    Due to the small magnitude of epsilon, it has inconsequential effects on the samples while ensuring numerical stability.

    “Due to the small magnitude of ϵ , it has inconsequential effects on the samples while ensuring numerical stability [34], [35].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [34] [34] C. KI Williams, Gaussian processes for machine learning. Taylor & Francis Group, 2006. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [35] [35] J. Orduz, 'Sampling from a multivariate normal distribution,' blog, March, 2019 [Online]. [Online]. Available: https://tinyurl.com/bcchm6c9 -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § A. System description · p. 16

    The load and PV distributions are selected so that network issues are visible for significant periods.

    “The load and PV distributions are selected so as the network issues are visible for significant periods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A. Flexibility: definition · p. 12

    Since ramp up and ramp down flexibility levels can compensate each other, they are dealt with separately in order to correctly assess the DN needs.

    “Since ramp up and ramp down flexibility levels can compensate each other, therefore, they are dealt with separately in order to correctly assess the DN needs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data
    § C. Case study 2: Marginal value of energy and power · p. 23

    Fig. 11(b) indicates the combinatorial nature of the flexibility needs assessment problem.

    “Fig. 11(b) also indicates the combinatorial nature of the flexibility needs assessment problem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § A. Flexibility: definition · p. 11

    These flexible resources have a limited ramp rate, power and energy to be utilized as flexibility.

    “Note these flexible resources have a limited ramp rate, power and energy to be utilized as flexibility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § A. System description · p. 16

    The feasibility of the solution of FNA-OPF is verified using power flows.

    “The feasibility of the solution of FNA-OPF is verified using power flows.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § C. Robust FNA under uncertainty · p. 15

    If εcc is too low, the risk for over-procurement is high; if εcc is too high, the risk of under-procurement is high.

    “If the ϵ cc is too low, then the risk for over-procurement is high. However, if the ϵ cc is too high, then the risk of under-procurement is high, see (10).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § II. SCENARIO GENERATION · p. 6

    This structure of scenario generation can be used for historical data and point forecasts with known forecast errors.

    “This structure of scenario generation can be used for historical data and point forecasts with known forecast errors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § C. Robust FNA under uncertainty · p. 15

    The chance constraint level denotes the amount of risk in the procurement of flexibility.

    “The chance constraint level will denote the amount of risk in the procurement of flexibility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § C. Robust FNA under uncertainty · p. 15

    To obtain a feasible solution in all scenarios, FNA-OPF is solved where each load and/or generation can be curtailed.

    “Note that to obtain a feasible solution in all the scenarios, we solve FNA-OPF where each load and/or generation can be curtailed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
52 of 52

  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The forecast error is 1.96 times the standard deviation of the normal distribution.

    “The forecast error is assumed to be 1.96 times the standard deviation of the normal distribution.”

  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Consumption is positive.

    “Since consumption is assumed positive, therefore, the load is strictly non-negative and DG is negative.”

  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Load forecast error and point forecast are known.

    “The load profile is sampled separately depending on load forecast error and its point forecast, both of which are assumed to be known.”

  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    DG forecast scenarios are the same for all DGs in the feeder, assuming all DGs are installed in geographical proximity to be not affected by different levels of solar irradiance.

    “These scenarios are assumed to be the same for all DGs in the feeder, assuming all DGs are installed in geographical proximity to be not affected by different levels of solar irradiance.”

  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    An ample amount of flexible resource is available.

    “Assuming ample amount of flexible resource available, there are many solutions that can solve DN issues, some of which could have the same objective function value.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For a DN, nodal voltages and line loadings should remain within operational bounds.

    “For a DN, nodal voltages and line loadings should remain within operational bounds.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The distribution of flexibility needs of a distribution network is not known.

    “Since the distribution of FNA of a DN is not known, ECDF is used for all subsequent results.”
7 of 7

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Eigenvalue-based factor is identified as a Cholesky factor

    Minor

    The stated formula gives a matrix square root of the covariance matrix, but it is not generally lower triangular. That conflicts with the paper's definition of L as the lower-triangular Cholesky factor.

1 of 1

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [7][7] A. C. Mei β ner, A. Dreher, K. Knorr, M. Vogt, H. Zarif, L. Jürgens, and M. Grasenack, 'A co-simulation of flexibility market based congestion management in northern germany,' in 2019 16th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1-6. -
  2. [32][32] K. Knezovi´ c, A. Soroudi, A. Keane, and M. Marinelli, 'Robust multi-objective pq scheduling for electric vehicles in flexible unbalanced distribution grids,' IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 11, no. 16, pp. 4031-4040, 2017. -
  3. [48][48] A. Buši´ c, M. U. Hashmi, and S. Meyn, 'Distributed control of a fleet of batteries,' in 2017 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, 2017, pp. 3406-3411. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Hashmi, M. U., Koirala, A., Ergun, H., & Van Hertem, D.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2207.10234
arXiv
2207.10234
OpenAlex
W4286750895
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
Keywords
chance-constrained programming, low-voltage distribution networks, distribution system operators, multi-period optimal power flow, scenario-based uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review