Cited by 123Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureSmart Grid Energy ManagementOptimal Power Flow Distribution

Distributed hierarchical coordination of networked charging stations based on peer-to-peer trading and EV charging flexibility quantification

Zhang, Jin, Che, Liang, Wan, Xin, Shahidehpour, Mohammad·2022·IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Abstract

Power systems are facing the challenges of integrating massive electric vehicles (EVs) and lacking operational flexibility. An optimal and efficient coordination strategy is needed to coordinate the operations among EV charging stations (CSs) and the distribution system operator (DSO) and to make full use of the EVs’ charging flexibility for improving the operational flexibility of power systems. To this end, this paper proposes a CSs-DSO distributed coordination strategy. The proposed strategy integrates a supply-curve-based quantification method to quantify the EVs’ flexibility contribution and a Nash bargaining game-theory-based peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions model for maximizing the profits of entities participating in the coordination. To tackle the CSs-DSO coordination problem that has a bi-level-parallel coupling structure, an analytical target cascading (ATC) and alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) jointly-based distributed solution approach is proposed. First, the CSs-DSO bi-level model is decoupled by ATC with tie-line power being the only exchanged information; then, the model is further decomposed for each CS by ADMM for protecting the CSs’ privacy and autonomy. The effect of coordination and the computational efficiency of the proposed strategy is verified by numerical simulations on a modified IEEE 33-bus distribution system connecting multiple CSs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpwrs.2021.3123351

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J., Che, L., Wan, X., & Shahidehpour, M.
Affiliations
  • Hunan University (CN)
  • Dadu River Hydropower Development Co. Ltd, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Published
2022-07
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
2961-2975
ISSN
  • 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0679
OpenAlex
W3208174016
Cited by
123
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 8
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Keywords
electric vehicle charging stations, peer-to-peer energy trading, distributed coordination, distribution system operators, Nash bargaining, supply curve, analytical target cascading, alternating direction method of multipliers, bi-level optimization, privacy preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review