The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Continuous-time predictive-maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system
Abstract
A predictive-maintenance structure for a gradually deteriorating single-unit system (continuous time/continuous state) is presented in this paper. The proposed decision model enables optimal inspection and replacement decision in order to balance the cost engaged by failure and unavailability on an infinite horizon. Two maintenance decision variables are considered: the preventive replacement threshold and the inspection schedule based on the system state. In order to assess the performance of the proposed maintenance structure, a mathematical model for the maintained system cost is developed using regenerative and semi-regenerative processes theory. Numerical experiments show that the s-expected maintenance cost rate on an infinite horizon can be minimized by a joint optimization of the replacement threshold and the a periodic inspection times. The proposed maintenance structure performs better than classical preventive maintenance policies which can be treated as particular cases. Using the proposed maintenance structure, a well-adapted strategy can automatically be selected for the maintenance decision-maker depending on the characteristics of the wear process and on the different unit costs. Even limit cases can be reached: for example, in the case of expensive inspection and costly preventive replacement, the optimal policy becomes close to a systematic periodic replacement policy. Most of the classical maintenance strategies (periodic inspection/replacement policy, systematic periodic replacement, corrective policy) can be emulated by adopting some specific inspection scheduling rules and replacement thresholds. In a more general way, the proposed maintenance structure shows its adaptability to different possible characteristics of the maintained single-unit system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review on maintenance optimization
de Jonge, B., & Scarf, P. A. (2020) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.09.047 · Cited by 567
Machine Learning approach for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0
Paolanti, M., Romeo, L., Felicetti, A., Mancini, A., Frontoni, E., & Loncarski, J. (2018) · 2018 14th IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA) · doi:10.1109/mesa.2018.8449150 · Cited by 296
Huynh, K. T., Barros, A., & Berenguer, C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.2012.2194174 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Grall, A., Dieulle, L., Berenguer, C., & Roussignol, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Reliability
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-150
- ISSN
- 0018-9529 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127103870
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous-time predictive-maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tr.2002.1011518
- The paper
- Grall, A., Dieulle, L., Berenguer, C., & Roussignol, M. (2002). Continuous-time predictive-maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2002.1011518
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.