The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remaining Useful Life Estimation Based on a Nonlinear Diffusion Degradation Process
Abstract
Remaining useful life estimation is central to the prognostics and health management of systems, particularly for safety-critical systems, and systems that are very expensive. We present a non-linear model to estimate the remaining useful life of a system based on monitored degradation signals. A diffusion process with a nonlinear drift coefficient with a constant threshold was transformed to a linear model with a variable threshold to characterize the dynamics and nonlinearity of the degradation process. This new diffusion process contrasts sharply with existing models that use a linear drift, and also with models that use a linear drift based on transformed data that were originally nonlinear. Both existing models are based on a constant threshold. To estimate the remaining useful life, an analytical approximation to the distribution of the first hitting time of the diffusion process crossing a threshold level is obtained in a closed form by a time-space transformation under a mild assumption. The unknown parameters in the established model are estimated using the maximum likelihood estimation approach, and goodness of fit measures are applied. The usefulness of the proposed model is demonstrated by several real-world examples. The results reveal that considering nonlinearity in the degradation process can significantly improve the accuracy of remaining useful life estimation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
The Theory of Stochastic Processes
Cox, D. R., Miller, H. D., Weiss, G., & Shuler, K. (1966) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3047872 · Cited by 3,324
Cited by
Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction
Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.016 · Cited by 2,634
Zhang, Z., Si, X., Hu, C., & Lei, Y. (2018) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.033 · Cited by 696
Self-citationStochastic modelling and analysis of degradation for highly reliable products
Ye, Z., & Xie, M. (2015) · Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry · doi:10.1002/asmb.2063 · Cited by 685
A Two-Stage Data-Driven-Based Prognostic Approach for Bearing Degradation Problem
Wang, Y., Peng, Y., Zi, Y., Jin, X., & Tsui, K.-L. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2016.2535368 · Cited by 344
A new class of Wiener process models for degradation analysis
Ye, Z.-S., Chen, N., & Shen, Y. (2015) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.02.005 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Si, X.-S., Wang, W., Hu, C.-H., Zhou, D.-H., & Pecht, M. G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Reliability
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-67
- ISSN
- 0018-9529 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1721
- OpenAlex
- W2108898839
- Cited by
- 662
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 97.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remaining Useful Life Estimation Based on a Nonlinear Diffusion Degradation Process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tr.2011.2182221
- The paper
- Si, X.-S., Wang, W., Hu, C.-H., Zhou, D.-H., & Pecht, M. G. (2012). Remaining Useful Life Estimation Based on a Nonlinear Diffusion Degradation Process. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2011.2182221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.