The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of Hybrid Prognostics Approaches for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Engineered Systems, and an Application to Battery Life Prediction
Abstract
Prognostics focuses on predicting the future performance of a system, specifically the time at which the system no long performs its desired functionality, its time to failure. As an important aspect of prognostics, remaining useful life (RUL) prediction estimates the remaining usable life of a system, which is essential for maintenance decision making and contingency mitigation. A significant amount of research has been reported in the literature to develop prognostics models that are able to predict a system's RUL. These models can be broadly categorized into experience-based models, date-driven models, and physics-based models. However, due to system complexity, data availability, and application constraints, there is no universally accepted best model to estimate RUL. The review part of this paper specifically focused on the development of hybrid prognostics approaches, attempting to leverage the advantages of combining the prognostics models in the aforementioned different categories for RUL prediction. The hybrid approaches reported in the literature were systematically classified by the combination and interfaces of various types of prognostics models. In the case study part, a hybrid prognostics method was proposed and applied to a battery degradation case to show the potential benefit of the hybrid prognostics approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ensemble methods in machine learning
Dietterich, T. G. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1 · Cited by 8,408
Prognostics methods for battery health monitoring using a bayesian framework
Saha, B., Goebel, K., Poll, S., & Christophersen, J. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2008.2005965 · Cited by 831
Prognostics in Battery Health Management
Goebel, K., Saha, B., Saxena, A., Celaya, J., & Christophersen, J. (2008) · IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine · doi:10.1109/mim.2008.4579269 · Cited by 594
Cited by
Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction
Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.016 · Cited by 2,634
Diez-Olivan, A., Del Ser, J., Galar, D., & Sierra, B. (2019) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.10.005 · Cited by 633
A novel health indicator for on-line lithium-ion batteries remaining useful life prediction
Zhou, Y., Huang, M., Chen, Y., & Tao, Y. (2016) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.119 · Cited by 289
Remaining useful life prediction of aircraft engine based on degradation pattern learning
Zhao, Z., Liang, B., Wang, X., & Lu, W. (2017) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2017.02.007 · Cited by 267
Overview of Real-Time Lifetime Prediction and Extension for SiC Power Converters
Ni, Z., Lyu, X., Yadav, O. P., Singh, B. N., Zheng, S., & Cao, D. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2019.2962503 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Liao, L., & Kottig, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Reliability
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 191-207
- ISSN
- 0018-9529 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1721
- OpenAlex
- W2155832827
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 53.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of Hybrid Prognostics Approaches for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Engineered Systems, and an Application to Battery Life Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tr.2014.2299152
- The paper
- Liao, L., & Kottig, F. (2014). Review of Hybrid Prognostics Approaches for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Engineered Systems, and an Application to Battery Life Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2014.2299152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.