The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A human-assisting manipulator teleoperated by EMG signals and arm motions
Open accessAbstract
This paper proposes a human-assisting manipulator teleoperated by electromyographic (EMG) signals and arm motions. The proposed method can realize a new master-slave manipulator system that uses no mechanical master controller. A person whose forearm has been amputated can use this manipulator as a personal assistant for desktop work. The control system consists of a hand and wrist control part and an arm control part. The hand and wrist control part selects an active joint in the manipulator's end-effector and controls it based on EMG pattern discrimination. The arm control part measures the position of the operator's wrist joint or the amputated part using a three-dimensional position sensor, and the joint angles of the manipulator's arm, except for the end-effector part, are controlled according to this position, which, in turn, corresponds to the position of the manipulator's joint. These control parts enable the operator to control the manipulator intuitively. The distinctive feature of our system is to use a novel statistical neural network for EMG pattern discrimination. The system can adapt itself to changes of the EMG patterns according to the differences among individuals, different locations of the electrodes, and time variation caused by fatigue or sweat. Our experiments have shown that the developed system could learn and estimate the operator's intended motions with a high degree of accuracy using the EMG signals, and that the manipulator could be controlled smoothly. We also confirmed that our system could assist the amputee in performing desktop work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cybernetics. Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine
N., E., & Wiener, N. (1949) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2020260 · Cited by 3,590
Cited by
Myoelectric control systems—A survey
Asghari Oskoei, M., & Hu, H. (2007) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2007.07.009 · Cited by 1,244
Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy
Krebs, H. I., Palazzolo, J. J., Dipietro, L., Ferraro, M., Krol, J., Rannekleiv, K., Volpe, B. T., & Hogan, N. (2003) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/a:1024494031121 · Cited by 714
Atzori, M., Cognolato, M., & Müller, H. (2016) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2016.00009 · Cited by 684
“The sEMG electrodes are positioned in order to combine two methods that are common in the field, i.e., a dense sampling approach (Fukuda et al., 2003; Tenore et al., 2009; Li et al., 2010) and a precise anatomical positioning strategy (De Luca, 1997; Castellini et al., 2009).”
MethodChu, J.-U., Moon, I., Lee, Y.-J., Kim, S.-K., & Mun, M.-S. (2007) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2007.897262 · Cited by 299
A survey of sensor fusion methods in wearable robotics
Novak, D., & Riener, R. (2015) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.012 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Fukuda, O., Tsuji, T., Kaneko, M., & Otsuka, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 210-222
- ISSN
- 1042-296X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164006146
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A human-assisting manipulator teleoperated by EMG signals and arm motions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tra.2003.808873
- The paper
- Fukuda, O., Tsuji, T., Kaneko, M., & Otsuka, A. (2003). A human-assisting manipulator teleoperated by EMG signals and arm motions. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation. https://doi.org/10.1109/tra.2003.808873
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.