The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vision and IMU Data Fusion: Closed-Form Solutions for Attitude, Speed, Absolute Scale, and Bias Determination
Open accessAbstract
This paper investigates the problem of vision and inertial data fusion. A sensor assembling that is constituted by one monocular camera, three orthogonal accelerometers, and three orthogonal gyroscopes is considered. The first paper contribution is the analytical derivation of all the observable modes, i.e., all the physical quantities that can be determined by only using the information in the sensor data that are acquired during a short time interval. Specifically, the observable modes are the speed and attitude (roll and pitch angles), the absolute scale, and the biases that affect the inertial measurements. This holds even in the case when the camera only observes a single point feature. The analytical derivation of the aforementioned observable modes is based on a nonstandard observability analysis, which fully accounts for the system nonlinearities. The second contribution is the analytical derivation of closed-form solutions, which analytically express all the aforementioned observable modes in terms of the visual and inertial measurements that are collected during a very short time interval. This allows the introduction of a very simple and powerful new method that is able to simultaneously estimate all the observable modes with no need for any initialization or a priori knowledge. Both the observability analysis and the derivation of the closed-form solutions are carried out in several different contexts, including the case of biased and unbiased inertial measurements, the case of a single and multiple features, and in the presence and absence of gravity. In addition, in all these contexts, the minimum number of camera images that are necessary for the observability is derived. The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated via extensive Monte Carlo simulations and real experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonlinear controllability and observability
Hermann, R., & Krener, A. (1977) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1977.1101601 · Cited by 2,374 · cited 1×
“In the following sections, we are reminded about some concepts in the theory by Hermann and Krener in [8] and some”
BackgroundA Multi-State Constraint Kalman Filter for Vision-aided Inertial Navigation
Mourikis, A. I., & Roumeliotis, S. I. (2007) · Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/robot.2007.364024 · Cited by 1,951
Partial Differential Equations
John, F. (1971) · Applied Mathematical Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-9966-1 · Cited by 1,932
Kuipers, J. B. (1999) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691211701 · Cited by 1,290
Corben, H. C., Stehle, P., & Chako, N. (1961) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3057243 · Cited by 1,229
Visual-Inertial Sensor Fusion: Localization, Mapping and Sensor-to-Sensor Self-calibration
Kelly, J., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2011) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364910382802 · Cited by 536
A Toolbox for Easily Calibrating Omnidirectional Cameras
Scaramuzza, D., Martinelli, A., & Siegwart, R. (2006) · 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · doi:10.1109/iros.2006.282372 · Cited by 510
Self-citationMirzaei, F. M., & Roumeliotis, S. I. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2008.2004486 · Cited by 442
Visual-inertial navigation, mapping and localization: A scalable real-time causal approach
Jones, E. S., & Soatto, S. (2011) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364910388963 · Cited by 435
A toolbox for easily calibrating omnidirectional cameras
Scaramuzza, D., Martinelli, A., & Siegwart, R. (2006) · doi:10.3929/ethz-a-005704721 · Cited by 405
Self-citation
Cited by
On-Manifold Preintegration for Real-Time Visual--Inertial Odometry
Forster, C., Carlone, L., Dellaert, F., & Scaramuzza, D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2016.2597321 · Cited by 1,502
High-precision, consistent EKF-based visual-inertial odometry
Li, M., & Mourikis, A. I. (2013) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913481251 · Cited by 813
IMU Preintegration on Manifold for Efficient Visual-Inertial Maximum-a-Posteriori Estimation
Forster, C., Carlone, L., Dellaert, F., & Scaramuzza, D. (2015) · Robotics: Science and Systems XI · doi:10.15607/rss.2015.xi.006 · Cited by 499
Visual-Inertial Navigation: A Concise Review
Huang, G. (2019) · 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2019.8793604 · Cited by 391
Camera-IMU-based localization: Observability analysis and consistency improvement
Hesch, J. A., Kottas, D. G., Bowman, S. L., & Roumeliotis, S. I. (2014) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913509675 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Martinelli, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Robotics
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-60
- ISSN
- 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0468
- OpenAlex
- W2054289217
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 40.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vision and IMU Data Fusion: Closed-Form Solutions for Attitude, Speed, Absolute Scale, and Bias Determination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tro.2011.2160468
- The paper
- Martinelli, A. (2012). Vision and IMU Data Fusion: Closed-Form Solutions for Attitude, Speed, Absolute Scale, and Bias Determination. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2011.2160468
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.