Cited by 245Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationInertial Sensor and NavigationTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Camera-IMU-based localization: Observability analysis and consistency improvement

Hesch, Joel A, Kottas, Dimitrios G, Bowman, Sean L, Roumeliotis, Stergios I·2014·The International Journal of Robotics Research

Abstract

This work investigates the relationship between system observability properties and estimator inconsistency for a Vision-aided Inertial Navigation System (VINS). In particular, first we introduce a new methodology for determining the unobservable directions of nonlinear systems by factorizing the observability matrix according to the observable and unobservable modes. Subsequently, we apply this method to the VINS nonlinear model and determine its unobservable directions analytically. We leverage our analysis to improve the accuracy and consistency of linearized estimators applied to VINS. Our key findings are evaluated through extensive simulations and experimental validation on real-world data, demonstrating the superior accuracy and consistency of the proposed VINS framework compared to standard approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0278364913509675

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The performance mismatch between filtering and MAP estimation gets smaller when the linearization point for the EKF is accurate, when using sliding-window filters, and when potential sources of inconsistency in the EKF are taken care of.

    “Not surprisingly, the performance mismatch between filtering and MAP estimation gets smaller when the linearization point for the EKF is accurate (as it happens in visual-inertial navigation problems), when using slidingwindow filters, and when potential sources of inconsistency in the EKF are taken care of [105, 108, 139].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Good features to track

    Shi, J., & Tomasi (1994) · Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR-94 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1994.323794 · Cited by 7,724 · cited 1×

    “Short-term features are extracted from images using the Shi–Tomasi corner detector (Shi and Tomasi 1994).”
    Method
  • Nonlinear controllability and observability

    Hermann, R., & Krener, A. (1977) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1977.1101601 · Cited by 2,374 · cited 9×

    “In this section, we provide a brief overview of the method in Hermann and Krener (1977) for studying the observability of nonlinear systems and then introduce a new methodology for determining its unobservable directions.”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1002/0471221279 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1017/CBO9780511804441 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1109/TAES.2008.4517003 · DOI
  4. Carlone L, 2012, Proceedings of the International symposium on artificial intelligence, robotics and automation in space, 7
  5. 10.2514/4.866463 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/34.993559 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/ROBOT.2009.5152778 · DOI
  8. Hesch JA, 2012, International workshop on the algorithmic foundations of robotics, 559
  9. 10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509693 · DOI
  10. Huang GP, 2008, Proceedings of the International symposium on experimental robotics, 373
  11. 10.1177/0278364909353640 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s10514-010-9207-y · DOI
  13. 10.1007/978-3-662-02581-9 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/0278364910388963 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0278364910382802 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.robot.2006.06.006 · DOI
  17. 10.5244/C.25.16 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/ICRA.2012.6225229 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/0278364913481251 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Lucas B, 1981, Proceedings of the International joint conference on artificial intelligence, 674
  21. 10.1109/TRO.2011.2170332 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/TRO.2011.2160468 · DOI
  23. Maybeck PS, 1979, Stochastic models, estimation, and control, 1
  24. 10.1137/1.9780898719512 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1109/TRO.2008.2004486 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/ROBOT.2007.364024 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1109/CVPR.2003.1211470 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1109/ROBOT.2002.1014801 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980357 · DOI
  30. Shi J, 1994, Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 593
  31. Shuster MD, 1993, Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 41, 439
  32. 10.1177/0278364904045593 · DOI
  33. Weiss S, 2012, Vision based navigation for micro helicopters
  34. 10.1109/ICRA.2012.6225002 · DOI
  35. 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5979997 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980291 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hesch, J. A., Kottas, D. G., Bowman, S. L., & Roumeliotis, S. I.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
The International Journal of Robotics Research
Published
2013-11-13
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
182-201
ISSN
  • 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3176
OpenAlex
W2056298239
Cited by
245
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 6
FWCI
26.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International Journal of Robotics Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Keywords
vision-aided inertial navigation, observability analysis, estimator inconsistency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review