The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuum Robots for Medical Applications: A Survey
Abstract
In this paper, we describe the state of the art in continuum robot manipulators and systems intended for application to interventional medicine. Inspired by biological trunks, tentacles, and snakes, continuum robot designs can traverse confined spaces, manipulate objects in complex environments, and conform to curvilinear paths in space. In addition, many designs offer inherent structural compliance and ease of miniaturization. After decades of pioneering research, a host of designs have now been investigated and have demonstrated capabilities beyond the scope of conventional rigid-link robots. Recently, we have seen increasing efforts aimed at leveraging these qualities to improve the frontiers of minimally invasive surgical interventions. Several concepts have now been commercialized, which are inspiring and enabling a current paradigm shift in surgical approaches toward flexible access routes, e.g., through natural orifices such as the nose. In this paper, we provide an overview of the current state of this field from the perspectives of both robotics science and medical applications. We discuss relevant research in design, modeling, control, and sensing for continuum manipulators, and we highlight how this work is being used to build robotic systems for specific surgical procedures. We provide perspective for the future by discussing current limitations, open questions, and challenges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics
Kim, S., Laschi, C., & Trimmer, B. (2013) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.002 · Cited by 2,092
Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey
Leite, I., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2013) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y · Cited by 871
Cited by
Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities
Laschi, C., Mazzolai, B., & Cianchetti, M. (2016) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aah3690 · Cited by 1,570
Biomedical applications of soft robotics
Cianchetti, M., Laschi, C., Menciassi, A., & Dario, P. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0022-y · Cited by 1,435
Ferromagnetic soft continuum robots
Kim, Y., Parada, G. A., Liu, S., & Zhao, X. (2019) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aax7329 · Cited by 1,312
Electronic skins and machine learning for intelligent soft robots
Shih, B., Shah, D., Li, J., Thuruthel, T. G., Park, Y.-L., Iida, F., Bao, Z., Kramer-Bottiglio, R., & Tolley, M. T. (2020) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aaz9239 · Cited by 715
Aceto, G., Persico, V., & Pescapé, A. (2018) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.02.008 · Cited by 504
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgner-Kahrs, J., Rucker, D. C., & Choset, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Robotics
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1261-1280
- ISSN
- 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0468
- OpenAlex
- W2184993170
- Cited by
- 1,557
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuum Robots for Medical Applications: A Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tro.2015.2489500
- The paper
- Burgner-Kahrs, J., Rucker, D. C., & Choset, H. (2015). Continuum Robots for Medical Applications: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2015.2489500
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.