The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Droid Analytics: A Signature Based Analytic System to Collect, Extract, Analyze and Associate Android Malware
Open accessAbstract
Smartphones and mobile devices are rapidly becoming indispensable devices for many users. Unfortunately, they also become fertile grounds for hackers to deploy malware. There is an urgent need to have a "security analytic & forensic system" which can facilitate analysts to examine, dissect, associate and correlate large number of mobile applications. An effective analytic system needs to address the following questions: How to automatically collect and manage a high volume of mobile malware? How to analyze a zero-day suspicious application, and compare or associate it with existing malware families in the database? How to reveal similar malicious logic in various malware, and to quickly identify the new malicious code segment? In this paper, we present the design and implementation of DroidAnalytics, a signature based analytic system to automatically collect, manage, analyze and extract android malware. The system facilitates analysts to retrieve, associate and reveal malicious logics at the "opcode level". We demonstrate the efficacy of DroidAnalytics using 150, 368 Android applications, and successfully determine 2, 475 Android malware from 102 different families, with 327 of them being zero-day malware samples from six different families. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case in showing such a large Android malware analysis/detection. The evaluation shows the DroidAnalytics is a valuable tool and is effective in analyzing malware repackaging and mutations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Comprehensive Review on Malware Detection Approaches
Aslan, O., & Samet, R. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2963724 · Cited by 649
Android Security: A Survey of Issues, Malware Penetration, and Defenses
Faruki, P., Bharmal, A., Laxmi, V., Ganmoor, V., Gaur, M. S., Conti, M., & Rajarajan, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2014.2386139 · Cited by 559
Identifying Malicious Software Using Deep Residual Long-Short Term Memory
Alotaibi, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2951751 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, M., Sun, M., & Lui, J. C. S.
- Venue
- 2013 12th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-07
- Pages
- 163-171
- OpenAlex
- W2028727337
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Droid Analytics: A Signature Based Analytic System to Collect, Extract, Analyze and Associate Android Malware. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/trustcom.2013.25
- The paper
- Zheng, M., Sun, M., & Lui, J. C. S. (2013). Droid Analytics: A Signature Based Analytic System to Collect, Extract, Analyze and Associate Android Malware. 2013 12th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/trustcom.2013.25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.