Cited by 34Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataTopic ModelingPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Automatic Anonymization of Textual Documents: Detecting Sensitive Information via Word Embeddings

Hassan, Fadi, Sanchez, David, Soria-Comas, Jordi, Domingo-Ferrer, Josep·2019·2019 18th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications/13th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE)

Abstract

Data sharing is key in a wide range of activities but raises serious privacy concerns when the data contain personal information. Anonymization mechanisms provide ways to transform the data so that identities and/or sensitive data are not disclosed (i.e., data are no longer personal). Even though a variety of methods have been proposed for structured data, automatic anonymization of unstructured text it still far from being solved. Textual data anonymization consists of detecting sensitive pieces of text, which are later removed and/or generalized. The detection process is especially challenging and it is usually based on classifiers pre-trained on large quantities of manually tagged data, which are able to detect a fixed set of (sensitive) entities such as names or locations. However, this approach is severely limited because sensitive information may appear in text in many forms and not all the appearances of a certain entity type may disclose information on the individual to be protected. In this work we propose a more general solution to text anonymization based on the notion of word embedding. The idea is to represent all the entities appearing in the document as word vectors that capture their semantic relationships. Then a particular entity (e.g. an individual or an organization) can automatically be protected by removing the other entities co-occurring in the document whose vectors are similar to the particular entity's vector. Furthermore, our method does not require manually tagged training data and is language-agnostic. We empirically evaluated our proposal on a collection of biographies. Our results show a significant improvement of the detection recall in comparison with classical approaches to text anonymization based on named entity recognition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/trustcom/bigdatase.2019.00055

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 2016, General Data Protection Regulation
  2. 1996, Health insurance portability and accountability act
  3. 10.3115/v1/P14-5010 · DOI
  4. mikolov, 2013, Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality, Advances in neural information processing systems, 3111
  5. morton, 2005, OpenNLP: A Java-based NLP toolkit, Proc of 10th Conf of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2005)
  6. 2005, Redacting with confidence: how to safely publish sanitized reports converted from Word to PDF, Report #I333-015R-2005
  7. 2011, Redaction of PDF files using Adobe Acrobat Professional X, Report #I73-025R-2011
  8. sahlgren, 2008, The distributional hypothesis, Italian Journal of Disability Studies, 20, 33
  9. 10.1145/1401890.1401997 · DOI
  10. tveit, 2004, Anonymization of general practioner medical records, 2nd HelsIT Conference (HelsIT 2004)
  11. 10.1109/MSP.2009.183 · DOI
  12. sweeney, 1996, Replacing personally-identifying information in medical records, the scrub system, Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium, 333
  13. 10.1109/ICARSC.2017.7964092 · DOI
  14. 0, Google Cloud
  15. westin, 1967, Privacy and Freedom
  16. 0, Data Loss Prevention
  17. 2010, Data, data everywhere: A special report on managing information, The Economist
  18. 10.1109/WI-IAT.2011.240 · DOI
  19. 0, Amazon Web Services (AWS)
  20. 10.1109/CIC.2005.1588104 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s10844-009-0103-x · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ins.2013.06.042 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/TIFS.2013.2239641 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.engappai.2016.12.013 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/asi.23363 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 0, spacy - industrial-strength natural language processing in python
  27. shilakes, 1998, Enterprise information portals

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hassan, F., Sanchez, D., Soria-Comas, J., & Domingo-Ferrer, J.
Affiliations
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Venue
2019 18th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications/13th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-08
Pages
358-365
OpenAlex
W2982673177
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
text anonymization, sensitive information detection, word embeddings, personal data protection, privacy, named entity recognition, unstructured text

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review