The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A state-of-the-art survey on software merging
Abstract
Software merging is an essential aspect of the maintenance and evolution of large-scale software systems. This paper provides a comprehensive survey and analysis of available merge approaches. Over the years, a wide variety of different merge techniques has been proposed. While initial techniques were purely based on textual merging, more powerful approaches also take the syntax and semantics of the software into account. There is a tendency towards operation-based merging because of its increased expressiveness. Another tendency is to try to define merge techniques that are as general, accurate, scalable, and customizable as possible, so that they can be used in any phase in the software life-cycle and detect as many conflicts as possible. After comparing the possible merge techniques, we suggest a number of important open problems and future research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Concurrency control in groupware systems
Ellis, C. A., & Gibbs, S. J. (1989) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/66926.66963 · Cited by 873
Classes of recursively enumerable sets and their decision problems
Rice, H. G. (1953) · Transactions of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-1953-0053041-6 · Cited by 869
Cited by
Early Detection of Collaboration Conflicts and Risks
Brun, Y., Holmes, R., Ernst, M. D., & Notkin, D. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2013.28 · Cited by 82
On the Nature of Merge Conflicts: A Study of 2,731 Open Source Java Projects Hosted by GitHub
Ghiotto, G., Murta, L., Barros, M., & van der Hoek, A. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2018.2871083 · Cited by 67
Understanding semi-structured merge conflict characteristics in open-source Java projects
Accioly, P., Borba, P., & Cavalcanti, G. (2018) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-017-9586-1 · Cited by 48
Program merge conflict resolution via neural transformers
Svyatkovskiy, A., Fakhoury, S., Ghorbani, N., Mytkowicz, T., Dinella, E., Bird, C., Jang, J., Sundaresan, N., & Lahiri, S. K. (2022) · Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3540250.3549163 · Cited by 38
Causes of merge conflicts: a case study of ElasticSearch
Mahmood, W., Chagama, M., Berger, T., & Hebig, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the 14th International Working Conference on Variability Modelling of Software-Intensive Systems · doi:10.1145/3377024.3377047 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Mens, T.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 449-462
- ISSN
- 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121668868
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 37.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A state-of-the-art survey on software merging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tse.2002.1000449
- The paper
- Mens, T. (2002). A state-of-the-art survey on software merging. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2002.1000449
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.