The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A taxonomy and catalog of runtime software-fault monitoring tools
Abstract
A goal of runtime software-fault monitoring is to observe software behavior to determine whether it complies with its intended behavior. Monitoring allows one to analyze and recover from detected faults, providing additional defense against catastrophic failure. Although runtime monitoring has been in use for over 30 years, there is renewed interest in its application to fault detection and recovery, largely because of the increasing complexity and ubiquitous nature of software systems. We present taxonomy that developers and researchers can use to analyze and differentiate recent developments in runtime software fault-monitoring approaches. The taxonomy categorizes the various runtime monitoring research by classifying the elements that are considered essential for building a monitoring system, i.e., the specification language used to define properties; the monitoring mechanism that oversees the program's execution; and the event handler that captures and communicates monitoring results. After describing the taxonomy, the paper presents the classification of the software-fault monitoring systems described in the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intrusion detection system: A comprehensive review
Liao, H.-J., Richard Lin, C.-H., Lin, Y.-C., & Tung, K.-Y. (2013) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2012.09.004 · Cited by 1,630
A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems
Nickerson, R. C., Varshney, U., & Muntermann, J. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.26 · Cited by 1,143
A taxonomy of model‐based testing approaches
Utting, M., Pretschner, A., & Legeard, B. (2012) · Software Testing, Verification and Reliability · doi:10.1002/stvr.456 · Cited by 632
Safety-critical advanced robots: A survey
Guiochet, J., Machin, M., & Waeselynck, H. (2017) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2017.04.004 · Cited by 231
(2010) · reroDoc Digital Library · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Delgado, N., Gates, A. Q., & Roach, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 859-872
- ISSN
- 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138916466
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A taxonomy and catalog of runtime software-fault monitoring tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tse.2004.91
- The paper
- Delgado, N., Gates, A. Q., & Roach, S. (2004). A taxonomy and catalog of runtime software-fault monitoring tools. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2004.91
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.