The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Security Requirements Engineering: A Framework for Representation and Analysis
Abstract
This paper presents a framework for security requirements elicitation and analysis. The framework is based on constructing a context for the system, representing security requirements as constraints, and developing satisfaction arguments for the security requirements. The system context is described using a problem-oriented notation, then is validated against the security requirements through construction of a satisfaction argument. The satisfaction argument consists of two parts: a formal argument that the system can meet its security requirements and a structured informal argument supporting the assumptions expressed in the formal argument. The construction of the satisfaction argument may fail, revealing either that the security requirement cannot be satisfied in the context or that the context does not contain sufficient information to develop the argument. In this case, designers and architects are asked to provide additional design information to resolve the problems. We evaluate the framework by applying it to a security requirements analysis within an air traffic control technology evaluation project.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Role-based access control models
Sandhu, R. S., Coyne, E. J., Feinstein, H. L., & Youman, C. E. (1996) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.485845 · Cited by 5,892
Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing
Avizienis, A., Laprie, J.-C., Randell, B., & Landwehr, C. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2004.2 · Cited by 5,223
On Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering
Chung, L., & do Prado Leite, J. C. S. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02463-4_19 · Cited by 2,247
Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour
van Lamsweerde, A. (2002) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/isre.2001.948567 · Cited by 1,723
Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering
Chung, L., Nixon, B. A., Yu, E., & Mylopoulos, J. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5269-7 · Cited by 1,690
Requirements Engineering: Processes and Techniques
Kotonya, G., & Sommerville, I. (1998) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 1,688
A Comparison of Commercial and Military Computer Security Policies
Clark, D. D., & Wilson, D. R. (1987) · 1987 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.1987.10001 · Cited by 1,137
Representing and using nonfunctional requirements: a process-oriented approach
Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., & Nixon, B. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.142871 · Cited by 1,018
Toulmin, S. E., Rieke, R. D., & Janik, A. S. (1979) · Cited by 923
Cited by
A survey of emerging threats in cybersecurity
Jang-Jaccard, J., & Nepal, S. (2014) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jcss.2014.02.005 · Cited by 892
A comparison of security requirements engineering methods
Fabian, B., Gürses, S., Heisel, M., Santen, T., & Schmidt, H. (2010) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00766-009-0092-x · Cited by 239
Towards a Unified Secure Cloud Service Development and Deployment Life-Cycle
Hudic, A., Flittner, M., Lorunser, T., Radl, P. M., & Bless, R. (2016) · 2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) · doi:10.1109/ares.2016.73 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Haley, C. B., Laney, R., Moffett, J. D., & Nuseibeh, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-153
- ISSN
- 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131730994
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 135.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Security Requirements Engineering: A Framework for Representation and Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tse.2007.70754
- The paper
- Haley, C. B., Laney, R., Moffett, J. D., & Nuseibeh, B. (2008). Security Requirements Engineering: A Framework for Representation and Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2007.70754
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
