The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Emotional Roller Coaster of Responding to Requirements Changes in Software Engineering
Open accessAbstract
Background:A preliminary study we conducted showed that software practitioners respond to requirements changes (RCs) with different emotions, and that their emotions vary at stages of the RC handling life cycle, such asreceiving, developing,anddeliveringRCs. Furthermore, such developer emotions have direct linkages to cognition, productivity, and decision making. Therefore, it is important to gain a comprehensive understanding the role of emotions in a critical scenarios like handling RCs.Objective:We wanted to study how practitionersemotionallyrespond to RCs.Method:We conducted a world-wide survey with the participation of 201 software practitioners. In our survey, we used the Job-related Affective Well-being Scale (JAWS) and open-ended questions to capture participants’ emotions when handling RCs in their work and query about the different circumstances when they feel these emotions. We used a combined approach of statistical analysis, JAWS, and Socio-Technical Grounded Theory (STGT)for Data Analysisto analyse our survey data.Findings:We identified (1) emotional responses to RCs, i.e., the most commonemotionsfelt by practitioners when handling RCs; (2) differentstimuli– such as the RC, the practitioner, team, manager, customer – that trigger these emotions through their own different characteristics; (3)emotion dynamics, i.e., the changes in emotions during the RC handling life cycle; (4)RC stageswhere particular emotions are triggered; and (5)time related aspectsthat regulate the emotion dynamics.Conclusion:Practitioners are not pleased with receiving RCs all the time. Last minute RCs introduced closer to a deadline especially violate emotional well-being of practitioners. We present some practical recommendations for practitioners to follow, including a dual-purpose emotion-centric decision guide to help decide when to introduce or accept an RC, and some future key research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previously [15] we found that RCs and stakeholders act as stimuli of triggering emotions at distinct events in project and RC handling life cycles.
“Previously [15] we found that RCs and the stakeholders act as the stimuli of triggering emotions particularly at distinct events in the project and RC handling life cycles.”
From A Framework for Emotion-Oriented Requirements Change Handling in Agile Software Engineering (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Research on emotions during requirements engineering activities, including while handling RCs, is extremely limited.
“However, research on emotions during requirements engineering activities, including while handling RCs is extremely limited [36], [14], [15].”
From A Framework for Emotion-Oriented Requirements Change Handling in Agile Software Engineering (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Less attention has been given to investigating the emotions of practitioners while handling requirements or RCs.
“However, less attention has been given to investigating the emotions of practitioners while handling requirements or RCs [14], [15].”
From A Framework for Emotion-Oriented Requirements Change Handling in Agile Software Engineering (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y · Cited by 4,980
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 10.1109/TSE.2021.3104732 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSEA.2009.17 · DOI
- Scherer, 1987, Toward a dynamic theory of emotion: The component process model of affective states, Geneva Stud. Emotion Commun., 1, 1
- 10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.219 · DOI
- VandenBos, 2007, APA Dictionary of Psychology
- 10.1007/978-3-642-16324-1_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/smr.1673 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/HSI.2013.6577877 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICSE.2015.334 · DOI
- Madampe, Towards understanding emotional response to requirements changes in Agile teams, 10.1145/3377816.3381722 · DOI
- 10.1109/SEmotion.2017.12 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSE.2021.3087906 · DOI
- Wrobel, Towards the participant observation of emotions in software development teams, 1545
- 10.1109/HSI.2013.6577875 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-07857-1_54 · DOI
- 10.7717/peerj.289 · DOI
- 10.1109/MS.2014.94 · DOI
- Colomo-Palacios, 2011, Using the affect grid to measure emotions in software requirements engineering, J. Universal Comput. Sci., 17, 1281
- 10.1109/TSE.2021.3106280 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.046 · DOI
- 10.1145/2068783.2068786 · DOI
- 10.1109/RE.2015.7320450 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-642-19858-8_18 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.414 · DOI
- 10.1109/REW.2017.33 · DOI
- 10.1109/WCSE.2010.105 · DOI
- 10.1145/3341105.3374095 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00259.x · DOI
- 10.19153/cleiej.21.1.6 · DOI
- 10.1109/COMTECH.2017.8065749 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-07857-1_54 · DOI
- 10.1145/3239235.3239245 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2478/s13382-014-0329-x · DOI
- 10.6007/ijarafms/v4-i1/585 · DOI
- 10.3109/01612840.2012.740767 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5_3 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSE.2002.1027796 · DOI
- 10.1109/ISESE.2003.1237967 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CHASE.2013.6614738 · DOI
- Strauss, 1998, Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques
- 10.1109/SEmotion.2019.00012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jss.2021.111206 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/SEmotion52567.2021.00011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jss.2020.110871 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10664-020-09875-y · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Framework for Emotion-Oriented Requirements Change Handling in Agile Software Engineering
Madampe, K., Hoda, R., & Grundy, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2023.3253145 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Madampe, K., Hoda, R., & Grundy, J.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 2023-03-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1171-1187
- ISSN
- 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-3520
- 2326-3881
- OpenAlex
- W3197515869
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- ARC Laureate Fellowship (FL190100035)
- Monash Faculty of IT scholarship
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- requirements change, emotional responses, software professionals, emotional well-being, emotional dynamics, deadline pressure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review