Cited by 56Power System Optimization and StabilityPower Systems Fault DetectionSmart Grid Security and Resilience

Spatial-Temporal Synchrophasor Data Characterization and Analytics in Smart Grid Fault Detection, Identification, and Impact Causal Analysis

Jiang, Huaiguang, Dai, Xiaoxiao, Gao, David Wenzhong, Zhang, Jun Jason, Zhang, Yingchen, Muljadi, Eduard·2016·IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid

Abstract

An approach of big data characterization for smart grids (SGs) and its applications in fault detection, identification, and causal impact analysis is proposed in this paper, which aims to provide substantial data volume reduction while keeping comprehensive information from synchrophasor measurements in spatial and temporal domains. Especially, based on secondary voltage control (SVC) and local SG observation algorithm, a two-layer dynamic optimal synchrophasor measurement devices selection algorithm (OSMDSA) is proposed to determine SVC zones, their corresponding pilot buses, and the optimal synchrophasor measurement devices. Combining the two-layer dynamic OSMDSA and matching pursuit decomposition, the synchrophasor data is completely characterized in the spatial-temporal domain. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed characterization approach, SG situational awareness is investigated based on hidden Markov model based fault detection and identification using the spatial-temporal characteristics generated from the reduced data. To identify the major impact buses, the weighted Granger causality for SGs is proposed to investigate the causal relationship of buses during system disturbance. The IEEE 39-bus system and IEEE 118-bus system are employed to validate and evaluate the proposed approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsg.2016.2552229

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, H., Dai, X., Gao, D. W., Zhang, J. J., Zhang, Y., & Muljadi, E.
Affiliations
  • National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
  • University of Denver (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
Published
2016-09
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
2525-2536
ISSN
  • 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-3061
OpenAlex
W2340093701
Cited by
56
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Power Systems Fault Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
Keywords
synchrophasor measurements, fault identification, secondary voltage control, matching pursuit decomposition, hidden Markov models, situational awareness, data reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review