The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Two-Layer Energy Management System for Microgrids With Hybrid Energy Storage Considering Degradation Costs
Abstract
The integration of renewable energy source (RES) and energy storage systems (ESS) in microgrids has provided potential benefit to end users and system operators. However, intermittent issues of RES and high cost of ESS need to be placed under scrutiny for economic operation of microgrids. This paper presents a two-layer predictive energy management system (EMS) for microgrids with hybrid ESS consisting of batteries and supercapacitors. Incorporating degradation costs of the hybrid ESS with respect to the depth of charge and lifetime, long-term costs of batteries and supercapacitors are modeled and transformed to short-term costs related to real-time operation. In order to maintain high system robustness at minimum operational cost, a hierarchical dispatch model is proposed to determine the scheduling of utilities in microgrids within a finite time horizon, in which the upper layer EMS minimizes the total operational cost and the lower layer EMS eliminates fluctuations induced by forecast errors. Simulation studies demonstrate that different types of energy storages can be utilized at two control layers for multiple decision-making objectives. Scenarios incorporating different pricing schemes, prediction horizon lengths, and forecast accuracies also verify the effectiveness of the proposed EMS structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries
Vetter, J., Novák, P., Wagner, M. R., Veit, C., Möller, K.-C., Besenhard, J. O., Winter, M., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M., Vogler, C., & Hammouche, A. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 · Cited by 3,987
Modeling of Lithium-Ion Battery Degradation for Cell Life Assessment
Xu, B., Oudalov, A., Ulbig, A., Andersson, G., & Kirschen, D. S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2016.2578950 · Cited by 1,162
Cited by
Energy Management in Microgrids with Renewable Energy Sources: A Literature Review
García Vera, Y. E., Dufo-López, R., & Bernal-Agustín, J. L. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9183854 · Cited by 369
Fang, S., Wang, Y., Gou, B., & Xu, Y. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2950538 · Cited by 328
Self-citationYang, Y., Bremner, S., Menictas, C., & Kay, M. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112671 · Cited by 325
Pippia, T., Sijs, J., & De Schutter, B. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · doi:10.1109/tcst.2019.2945023 · Cited by 58
Sun, X., & Qiu, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · doi:10.1109/tte.2021.3138204 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Ju, C., Wang, P., Goel, L., & Xu, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 6047-6057
- ISSN
- 1949-3053 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-3061
- OpenAlex
- W2614034933
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Two-Layer Energy Management System for Microgrids With Hybrid Energy Storage Considering Degradation Costs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsg.2017.2703126
- The paper
- Ju, C., Wang, P., Goel, L., & Xu, Y. (2018). A Two-Layer Energy Management System for Microgrids With Hybrid Energy Storage Considering Degradation Costs. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2017.2703126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.