Cited by 168Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)Network Security and Intrusion Detection

Distributed Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Intrusion Detection Systems for VANETs

Zhang, Tao, Zhu, Quanyan·2018·IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks

Abstract

Vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) is an enabling technology in modern transportation systems for providing safety and valuable information, and yet vulnerable to a number of attacks from passive eavesdropping to active interfering. Intrusion detection systems (IDSs) are important devices that can mitigate the threats by detecting malicious behaviors. Furthermore, the collaborations among vehicles in VANETs can improve the detection accuracy by communicating their experiences between nodes. To this end, distributed machine learning is a suitable framework for the design of scalable and implementable collaborative detection algorithms over VANETs. One fundamental barrier to collaborative learning is the privacy concern as nodes exchange data among them. A malicious node can obtain sensitive information of other nodes by inferring from the observed data. In this paper, we propose a privacy-preserving machine-learningbased collaborative IDS (PML-CIDS) for VANETs. The proposed algorithm employs the alternating direction method of multipliers to a class of empirical risk minimization problems and trains a classifier to detect the intrusions in the VANETs. We use the differential privacy to capture the privacy notation of the PML-CIDS and propose a method of dual-variable perturbation to provide dynamic differential privacy. We analyze theoretical performance and characterize the fundamental tradeoff between the security and privacy of the PML-CIDS. We also conduct numerical experime…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsipn.2018.2801622

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, T., & Zhu, Q.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks
Published
2018-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
148-161
ISSN
  • 2373-776X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-7778
OpenAlex
W2790544619
Cited by
168
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 7
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (CNS-1544782 and CNS-1720230)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
vehicular ad hoc networks, intrusion detection systems, privacy-preserving machine learning, distributed collaborative learning, differential privacy, alternating direction method of multipliers, empirical risk minimization, NSL-KDD dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review