The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anomaly Detection Based on Convolutional Recurrent Autoencoder for IoT Time Series
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) realizes the interconnection of heterogeneous devices by the technology of wireless and mobile communication. The data of target regions are collected by widely distributed sensing devices and transmitted to the processing center for aggregation and analysis as the basis of IoT. The quality of IoT services usually depends on the accuracy and integrity of data. However, due to the adverse environment or device defects, the collected data will be anomalous. Therefore, the effective method of anomaly detection is the crucial issue for guaranteeing service quality. Deep learning is one of the most concerned technology in recent years which realizes automatic feature extraction from raw data. In this article, the integrated model of the convolutional neural network (CNN) and recurrent autoencoder is proposed for anomaly detection. Simple combination of CNN and autoencoder cannot improve classification performance, especially, for time series. Therefore, we utilize the two-stage sliding window in data preprocessing to learn better representations. Based on the characteristics of the Yahoo Webscope S5 dataset, raw time series with anomalous points are extended to fixed-length sequences with normal or anomaly label via the first-stage sliding window. Then, each sequence is transformed into continuous time-dependent subsequences by another smaller sliding window. The preprocessing of the two-stage sliding window can be considered as low-level temporal feature extraction, and we empirically prove that the preprocessing of the two-stage sliding window will be useful for high-level feature extraction in the integrated model. After data preprocessing, spatial and temporal features are extracted in CNN and recurrent autoencoder for the classification in fully connected networks. Empiric results show that the proposed model has better performances on multiple classification metrics and achieves preferable effect on anomaly detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
End-to-end encrypted traffic classification with one-dimensional convolution neural networks
Wang, W., Zhu, M., Wang, J., Zeng, X., & Yang, Z. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) · doi:10.1109/isi.2017.8004872 · Cited by 991
Self-citationLSTM-based Encoder-Decoder for Multi-sensor Anomaly Detection
Malhotra, P., Ramakrishnan, A., Anand, G., Vig, L., Agarwal, P., & Shroff, G. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.00148 · Cited by 819
A Distributed Anomaly Detection System for In-Vehicle Network Using HTM
Wang, C., Zhao, Z., Gong, L., Zhu, L., Liu, Z., & Cheng, X. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2799210 · Cited by 145
Cited by
Cellular, Wide-Area, and Non-Terrestrial IoT: A Survey on 5G Advances and the Road Toward 6G
Vaezi, M., Azari, A., Khosravirad, S. R., Shirvanimoghaddam, M., Azari, M. M., Chasaki, D., & Popovski, P. (2022) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2022.3151028 · Cited by 631
Li, G., & Jung, J. J. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2022.10.008 · Cited by 361
IoT anomaly detection methods and applications: A survey
Chatterjee, A., & Ahmed, B. S. (2022) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2022.100568 · Cited by 323
Internet of Things as System of Systems: A Review of Methodologies, Frameworks, Platforms, and Tools
Fortino, G., Savaglio, C., Spezzano, G., & Zhou, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2020.3042898 · Cited by 285
LSTM-Autoencoder-Based Anomaly Detection for Indoor Air Quality Time-Series Data
Wei, Y., Jang-Jaccard, J., Xu, W., Sabrina, F., Camtepe, S., & Boulic, M. (2023) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2022.3230361 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Yin, C., Zhang, S., Wang, J., & Xiong, N. N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 112-122
- ISSN
- 2168-2216 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2232
- OpenAlex
- W3004999940
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 16.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anomaly Detection Based on Convolutional Recurrent Autoencoder for IoT Time Series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmc.2020.2968516
- The paper
- Yin, C., Zhang, S., Wang, J., & Xiong, N. N. (2022). Anomaly Detection Based on Convolutional Recurrent Autoencoder for IoT Time Series. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2020.2968516
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.