The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructures: Attack and Defense Modeling
Abstract
Disruption of electric power operations can be catastrophic on national security and the economy. Due to the complexity of widely dispersed assets and the interdependences among computer, communication, and power infrastructures, the requirement to meet security and quality compliance on operations is a challenging issue. In recent years, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) established a cybersecurity standard that requires utilities' compliance on cybersecurity of control systems. This standard identifies several cyber-related vulnerabilities that exist in control systems and recommends several remedial actions (e.g., best practices). In this paper, a comprehensive survey on cybersecurity of critical infrastructures is reported. A supervisory control and data acquisition security framework with the following four major components is proposed: (1)real-time monitoring; (2)anomaly detection; (3)impact analysis; and (4)mitigation strategies. In addition, an attack-tree-based methodology for impact analysis is developed. The attack-tree formulation based on power system control networks is used to evaluatesystem-,scenario-, andleaf-level vulnerabilities by identifying the system's adversary objectives. The leaf vulnerability is fundamental to the methodology that involves port auditing or password strength evaluation. The measure of vulnerabilities in the power system control framework is determined based on existing cybersecurity conditions, and then, the vulnerability indices are evaluated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies
(2001) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/37.969131 · Cited by 2,851
Toward a smart grid: power delivery for the 21st century
Massoud Amin, S., & Wollenberg, B. F. (2005) · IEEE Power and Energy Magazine · doi:10.1109/mpae.2005.1507024 · Cited by 1,630
Attack trees : Modeling security threats
Schneier, B. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 635
Vulnerability Assessment of Cybersecurity for SCADA Systems
Ten, C.-W., Liu, C.-C., & Manimaran, G. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2008.2002298 · Cited by 583
Self-citationAnalysis of Electric Grid Security Under Terrorist Threat
Salmeron, J., Wood, K., & Baldick, R. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2004.825888 · Cited by 562
Model-based evaluation: from dependability to security
Nicol, D. M., Sanders, W. H., & Trivedi, K. S. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2004.11 · Cited by 510
Power System Control Centers: Past, Present, and Future
Wu, F. F., Moslehi, K., & Bose, A. (2005) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2005.857499 · Cited by 473
Game strategies in network security
Lye, K.-W., & Wing, J. M. (2005) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-004-0060-x · Cited by 443
Classification and detection of computer intrusions
Kumar, S. S. (1996) · Cited by 384
A quantitative model of the security intrusion process based on attacker behavior
Jonsson, E., & Olovsson, T. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.588541 · Cited by 268
Cited by
Cyber–Physical System Security for the Electric Power Grid
Sridhar, S., Hahn, A., & Govindarasu, M. (2012) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2011.2165269 · Cited by 1,208
A survey of emerging threats in cybersecurity
Jang-Jaccard, J., & Nepal, S. (2014) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jcss.2014.02.005 · Cited by 892
A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems
Cherdantseva, Y., Burnap, P., Blyth, A., Eden, P., Jones, K., Soulsby, H., & Stoddart, K. (2016) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2015.09.009 · Cited by 606
“Out of twenty-four papers examined a software prototype or tool supporting the method is discussed only in seven papers, namely Baiardi et al. (2009); Cardenas et al. (2011); Kriaa et al. (2012); LeMay et al. (2011); Patel and Zaveri (2010); Roy et al. (2010); Ten et al. (2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialReview of security issues in industrial networks
Cheminod, M., Durante, L., & Valenzano, A. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2012.2198666 · Cited by 349
Securing internet of medical things systems: limitations, issues and recommendations
Yaacoub, J.-P. A., Noura, M., Noura, H. N., Salman, O., Yaacoub, E., Couturier, R., & Chehab, A. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.12.028 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Ten, C.-W., Manimaran, G., & Liu, C.-C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 853-865
- ISSN
- 1083-4427 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2426
- OpenAlex
- W2154971967
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 21.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructures: Attack and Defense Modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmca.2010.2048028
- The paper
- Ten, C.-W., Manimaran, G., & Liu, C.-C. (2010). Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructures: Attack and Defense Modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmca.2010.2048028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.