The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative Control for a Robotic Wheelchair: Evaluation of Performance, Attention, and Workload
Open accessAbstract
Powered wheelchair users often struggle to drive safely and effectively and, in more critical cases, can only get around when accompanied by an assistant. To address these issues, we propose a collaborative control mechanism that assists users as and when they require help. The system uses a multiple-hypothesis method to predict the driver's intentions and, if necessary, adjusts the control signals to achieve the desired goal safely. The main emphasis of this paper is on a comprehensive evaluation, where we not only look at the system performance but also, perhaps more importantly, characterize the user performance in an experiment that combines eye tracking with a secondary task. Without assistance, participants experienced multiple collisions while driving around the predefined route. Conversely, when they were assisted by the collaborative controller, not only did they drive more safely but also they were able to pay less attention to their driving, resulting in a reduced cognitive workload. We discuss the importance of these results and their implications for other applications of shared control, such as brain-machine interfaces, where it could be used to compensate for both the low frequency and the low resolution of the user input.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model
Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.05-07-01688.1985 · Cited by 4,395
Evidence for the Flexible Sensorimotor Strategies Predicted by Optimal Feedback Control
Liu, D., & Todorov, E. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1110-06.2007 · Cited by 447
Cited by
Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration
Ajoudani, A., Zanchettin, A. M., Ivaldi, S., Albu-Schäffer, A., Kosuge, K., & Khatib, O. (2018) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-017-9677-2 · Cited by 832
Bi, L., Feleke, A. >., & Guan, C. (2019) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2019.02.011 · Cited by 418
Riek, L. D. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3127874 · Cited by 257
A Comprehensive Review of Smart Wheelchairs: Past, Present, and Future
Leaman, J., & La, H. M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2017.2706727 · Cited by 253
Towards Independence: A BCI Telepresence Robot for People With Severe Motor Disabilities
Leeb, R., Tonin, L., Rohm, M., Desideri, L., Carlson, T., & Millan, J. D. R. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2419736 · Cited by 187
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlson, T., & Demiris, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics)
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 876-888
- ISSN
- 1083-4419 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0492
- OpenAlex
- W2012976444
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaborative Control for a Robotic Wheelchair: Evaluation of Performance, Attention, and Workload. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmcb.2011.2181833
- The paper
- Carlson, T., & Demiris, Y. (2012). Collaborative Control for a Robotic Wheelchair: Evaluation of Performance, Attention, and Workload. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcb.2011.2181833
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.