The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Noise Tolerance Under Risk Minimization
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we explore noise-tolerant learning of classifiers. We formulate the problem as follows. We assume that there is an unobservable training set that is noise free. The actual training set given to the learning algorithm is obtained from this ideal data set by corrupting the class label of each example. The probability that the class label of an example is corrupted is a function of the feature vector of the example. This would account for most kinds of noisy data one encounters in practice. We say that a learning method is noise tolerant if the classifiers learnt with noise-free data and with noisy data, both have the same classification accuracy on the noise-free data. In this paper, we analyze the noise-tolerance properties of risk minimization (under different loss functions). We show that risk minimization under 0-1 loss function has impressive noise-tolerance properties and that under squared error loss is tolerant only to uniform noise; risk minimization under other loss functions is not noise tolerant. We conclude this paper with some discussion on the implications of these theoretical results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identifying Mislabeled Training Data
Brodley, C. E., & Friedl, M. A. (1999) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.606 · Cited by 612
Cited by
Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labels
Zhang, Z., & Sabuncu, M. R. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.07836 · Cited by 1,907
“Then, the empirical risk minimization under loss function L is defined to be noise tolerant [25] if f∗ is a global minimum of the noisy risk R L(f).”
BackgroundClassification in the Presence of Label Noise: A Survey
Frenay, B., & Verleysen, M. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2013.2292894 · Cited by 1,777
Learning From Noisy Labels With Deep Neural Networks: A Survey
Song, H., Kim, M., Park, D., Shin, Y., & Lee, J.-G. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3152527 · Cited by 1,308
Learning from massive noisy labeled data for image classification
Xiao, T., Xia, T., Yang, Y., Huang, C., & Wang, X. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298885 · Cited by 907
Classification with Noisy Labels by Importance Reweighting
Liu, T., & Tao, D. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2456899 · Cited by 782
Metadata
- Authors
- Manwani, N., & Sastry, P. S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1146-1151
- ISSN
- 2168-2267 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2275
- OpenAlex
- W2102348129
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noise Tolerance Under Risk Minimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmcb.2012.2223460
- The paper
- Manwani, N., & Sastry, P. S. (2013). Noise Tolerance Under Risk Minimization. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcb.2012.2223460
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.