The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MOEA/D-ACO: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Using Decomposition and AntColony
Abstract
Combining ant colony optimization (ACO) and the multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (EA) based on decomposition (MOEA/D), this paper proposes a multiobjective EA, i.e., MOEA/D-ACO. Following other MOEA/D-like algorithms, MOEA/D-ACO decomposes a multiobjective optimization problem into a number of single-objective optimization problems. Each ant (i.e., agent) is responsible for solving one subproblem. All the ants are divided into a few groups, and each ant has several neighboring ants. An ant group maintains a pheromone matrix, and an individual ant has a heuristic information matrix. During the search, each ant also records the best solution found so far for its subproblem. To construct a new solution, an ant combines information from its group's pheromone matrix, its own heuristic information matrix, and its current solution. An ant checks the new solutions constructed by itself and its neighbors, and updates its current solution if it has found a better one in terms of its own objective. Extensive experiments have been conducted in this paper to study and compare MOEA/D-ACO with other algorithms on two sets of test problems. On the multiobjective 0-1 knapsack problem,MOEA/D-ACO outperforms the MOEA/D with conventional genetic operators and local search on all the nine test instances. We also demonstrate that the heuristic information matrices in MOEA/D-ACO are crucial to the good performance of MOEA/D-ACO for the knapsack problem. On the biobjective traveling salesman problem, MOEA/D-ACO performs much better than the BicriterionAnt on all the 12 test instances. We also evaluate the effects of grouping, neighborhood, and the location information of current solutions on the performance of MOEA/D-ACO. The work in this paper shows that reactive search optimization scheme, i.e., the "learning while optimizing" principle, is effective in improving multiobjective optimization algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.996017 · Cited by 50,053
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Deb, K., & Kalyanmoy, D. (2001) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 14,918
Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents
Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., & Colorni, A. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/3477.484436 · Cited by 12,067
MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition
Zhang, Q., & Li, H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2007.892759 · Cited by 10,069
Self-citationMultiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach
Zitzler, E., & Thiele, L. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.797969 · Cited by 8,798
Ant colony system: a cooperative learning approach to the traveling salesman problem
Dorigo, M., & Gambardella, L. M. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585892 · Cited by 8,081
(2007) · Handbook of Approximation Algorithms and Metaheuristics · doi:10.1201/9781420010749-33 · Cited by 6,607
Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems
(2007) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Series · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-36797-2 · Cited by 5,686
Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization
Miettinen, K. (1998) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5563-6 · Cited by 4,710
Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization
Mardle, S., & Miettinen, K. M. (2000) · The Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/254267 · Cited by 3,049
Cited by
A Survey of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms based on Decomposition
Trivedi, A., Srinivasan, D., Sanyal, K., & Ghosh, A. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2016.2608507 · Cited by 549
Multiobjective Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Using Memetic Algorithms
Yuan, Y., & Xu, H. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2013.2274517 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Ke, L., Zhang, Q., & Battiti, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1845-1859
- ISSN
- 2168-2267 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2275
- OpenAlex
- W2073478661
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 26.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MOEA/D-ACO: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Using Decomposition and AntColony. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmcb.2012.2231860
- The paper
- Ke, L., Zhang, Q., & Battiti, R. (2013). MOEA/D-ACO: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Using Decomposition and AntColony. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcb.2012.2231860
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.