The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk Modeling, Assessment, And Management
Abstract
Integrates the art and science of risk analysis. Clearly shows how to quantify risk and construct probability in conjunction with real-world decision-making problems, including a host of institutional, organizational, political, and cultural considerations. Presents basic concepts as well as advanced material, avoiding higher mathematics whenever possible. Incorporates numerous examples and case studies to illustrate the analytical methods under discussion. An accompanying web site will offer 200 example problems and case studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies
(2001) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/37.969131 · Cited by 2,851
The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards
Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x · Cited by 1,796
Cyber security risk assessment for SCADA and DCS networks
Ralston, P. A. S., Graham, J. H., & Hieb, J. L. (2007) · ISA Transactions · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2007.04.003 · Cited by 267
An online testing design choice typology towards cheating threat minimisation
Munoz, A., & Mackay, J. (2019) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.16.3.5 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Haimes, Y. Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews)
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 315-315
- ISSN
- 1094-6977 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2442
- OpenAlex
- W2032398986
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Modeling, Assessment, And Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmcc.1999.760577
- The paper
- Haimes, Y. Y. (1999). Risk Modeling, Assessment, And Management. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcc.1999.760577
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
