The DOI matches its Crossref record.
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews)
Abstract
—Action recognition with cluttered and moving background is a challenging problem. One main difficulty lies in the fact that the motion field in an action region is contaminated by the background motions. We propose a Hierarchical Filtered Motion (HFM) method to recognize actions in crowded videos by using Motion History Image (MHI) as basic representations of motion due to its robustness and efficiency. First, we detect interest points as the 2D Harris corners with recent motion, e.g. locations with high intensities in MHI. Then a global spatial motion smoothing filter is applied to the gradients of MHI to eliminate isolated unreliable or noisy motions. At each interest point, a local motion field filter is applied to the smoothed gradients of MHI by computing a structure proximity between any pixel in the local region and the interest point. Thus the motion at a pixel is enhanced or weakened based on its structure proximity with the interest point. To validate its effectiveness, we characterize the spatial and temporal features by Histograms of Oriented Gradient (HOG) in the intensity image and MHI respectively and use a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) based classifier for action recognition. The performance of the proposed approach achieves the state-of-the-art results on KTH dataset which has clean background. More importantly, we perform cross dataset action classification and detection experiments where KTH dataset is used for training while MSR Action Dataset II, which consists of crowded videos with people moving in the background, is used for testing. Our experiments show that the proposed hierarchical filtered motion method significantly outperforms existing techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vigilance Requires Hard Mental Work and Is Stressful
Warm, J. S., Parasuraman, R., & Matthews, G. (2008) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x312152 · Cited by 1,253
Cybersecurity data science: an overview from machine learning perspective
Sarker, I. H., Kayes, A. S. M., Badsha, S., Alqahtani, H., Watters, P., & Ng, A. (2020) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-020-00318-5 · Cited by 766
Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation
Parasuraman, R., & Wickens, C. D. (2008) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x312198 · Cited by 401
A Pearson’s correlation coefficient based decision tree and its parallel implementation
Mu, Y., Liu, X., & Wang, L. (2018) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2017.12.059 · Cited by 336
Understanding Transportation as a System-of-Systems Design Problem
DeLaurentis, D. (2005) · 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit · doi:10.2514/6.2005-123 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews)
- Published
- 2023-04-26
- ISSN
- 1094-6977 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2442
- OpenAlex
- W639589423
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmcc.5326
- The paper
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews). (2023). IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcc.5326
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.