The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A generalized divergence measure for robust image registration
Abstract
Entropy-based divergence measures have shown promising results in many areas of engineering and image processing. We define a new generalized divergence measure, namely, the Jensen-Renyi (1996, 1976) divergence. Some properties such as convexity and its upper bound are derived. Based on the Jensen-Renyi divergence, we propose a new approach to the problem of image registration. Some appealing advantages of registration by Jensen-Renyi divergence are illustrated, and its connections to mutual information-based registration techniques are analyzed. As the key focus of this paper, we apply Jensen-Renyi divergence for inverse synthetic aperture radar (ISAR) image registration. The goal is to estimate the target motion during the imaging time. Our approach applies Jensen-Renyi divergence to measure the statistical dependence between consecutive ISAR image frames, which would be maximal if the images are geometrically aligned. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method is efficient and effective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information
Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., & Suetens, P. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.563664 · Cited by 4,547
Cited by
Deformable medical image registration: a survey
Sotiras, A., Davatzikos, C., & Paragios, N. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2013.2265603 · Cited by 1,587
“Its use for image registration was proposed in [268, 269].”
BackgroundA review of multimodal image matching: Methods and applications
Jiang, X., Ma, J., Xiao, G., Shao, Z., & Guo, X. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.02.012 · Cited by 532
On Advances in Statistical Modeling of Natural Images
Srivastava, A., Lee, A. B., Simoncelli, E. P., & Zhu, S.-C. (2003) · Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1021889010444 · Cited by 485
Uniform Robust Scale-Invariant Feature Matching for Optical Remote Sensing Images
Sedaghat, A., Mokhtarzade, M., & Ebadi, H. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2011.2144607 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- He, Y., Ben Hamza, A., & Krim, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1211-1220
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158042553
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A generalized divergence measure for robust image registration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsp.2003.810305
- The paper
- He, Y., Ben Hamza, A., & Krim, H. (2003). A generalized divergence measure for robust image registration. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2003.810305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.