Cited by 71EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNumerical methods in inverse problemsNeural dynamics and brain function

Space–time event sparse penalization for magneto-/electroencephalography

Open access
Bolstad, Andrew, Veen, Barry Van, Nowak, Robert·2009·NeuroImage

Abstract

This article presents a new spatio-temporal method for M/EEG source reconstruction based on the assumption that only a small number of events, localized in space and/or time, are responsible for the measured signal. Each space-time event is represented using a basis function expansion which reflects the most relevant (or measurable) features of the signal. This model of neural activity leads naturally to a Bayesian likelihood function which balances the model fit to the data with the complexity of the model, where the complexity is related to the number of included events. A novel Expectation-Maximization algorithm which maximizes the likelihood function is presented. The new method is shown to be effective on several MEG simulations of neurological activity as well as data from a self-paced finger tapping experiment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.056

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rockafellar RT 1970 Convex Analysis Princeton University Press Princeton, New Jersey
  2. Wagner M Fuchs M Kastner J Aug 2002 Current density reconstructions and deviation scans using extended sources Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Biomagnetism Jena Germany
  3. Wagner M Köhler T Fuchs M Kastner J Aug 2000 An extended source model for current density reconstructions Nenonen J Ilmoniemi R Katila T Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Biomagnetism Espoo: Helsinki Univ of Technology Espoo, Finland 749 752

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bolstad, A., Veen, B. V., & Nowak, R.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Bolstad, Andrew
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
1066-1081
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136760486
Cited by
71
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R21EB005473)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
magnetoencephalography, EEG, source localization, basis function expansion, expectation-maximization algorithm, neural activity modeling
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain Mapping, Computer Simulation, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Neurological, Magnetoencephalography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review