The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theoretical Results on Sparse Representations of Multiple-Measurement Vectors
Abstract
The sparse representation of a multiple-measurement vector (MMV) is a relatively new problem in sparse representation. Efficient methods have been proposed. Although many theoretical results that are available in a simple case-single-measurement vector (SMV)-the theoretical analysis regarding MMV is lacking. In this paper, some known results of SMV are generalized to MMV. Some of these new results take advantages of additional information in the formulation of MMV. We consider the uniqueness under both an lscr0-norm-like criterion and an lscr1-norm-like criterion. The consequent equivalence between the lscr0-norm approach and the lscr1-norm approach indicates a computationally efficient way of finding the sparsest representation in a redundant dictionary. For greedy algorithms, it is proven that under certain conditions, orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) can find the sparsest representation of an MMV with computational efficiency, just like in SMV. Simulations show that the predictions made by the proved theorems tend to be very conservative; this is consistent with some recent advances in probabilistic analysis based on random matrix theory. The connections will be discussed
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Cited by
Block-Sparse Signals: Uncertainty Relations and Efficient Recovery
Eldar, Y. C., Kuppinger, P., & Bolcskei, H. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2010.2044837 · Cited by 1,313
Robust Recovery of Signals From a Structured Union of Subspaces
Eldar, Y. C., & Mishali, M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2030471 · Cited by 1,044
Blind Multiband Signal Reconstruction: Compressed Sensing for Analog Signals
Mishali, M., & Eldar, Y. C. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2009.2012791 · Cited by 819
Distributed Compressive CSIT Estimation and Feedback for FDD Multi-User Massive MIMO Systems
(2014) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2014.2324991 · Cited by 685
Spatially Common Sparsity Based Adaptive Channel Estimation and Feedback for FDD Massive MIMO
Gao, Z., Dai, L., Wang, Z., & Chen, S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2015.2463260 · Cited by 497
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, J., & Huo, X.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4634-4643
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164696938
- Cited by
- 810
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical Results on Sparse Representations of Multiple-Measurement Vectors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsp.2006.881263
- The paper
- Chen, J., & Huo, X. (2006). Theoretical Results on Sparse Representations of Multiple-Measurement Vectors. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2006.881263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.