Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 611

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

One or Two Frequencies? The Empirical Mode Decomposition Answers

Open access
Rilling, G., Flandrin, P.·2008·IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Abstract

This paper investigates how the empirical mode decomposition (EMD), a fully data-driven technique recently introduced for decomposing any oscillatory waveform into zero-mean components, behaves in the case of a composite two-tones signal. Essentially two regimes are shown to exist, depending on whether the amplitude ratio of the tones is greater or smaller than unity, and the corresponding resolution properties of the EMD turn out to be in good agreement with intuition and physical interpretation. A refined analysis is provided for quantifying the observed behaviors and theoretical claims are supported by numerical experiments. The analysis is then extended to a nonlinear model where the same two regimes are shown to exist and the resolution properties of the EMD are assessed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsp.2007.906771

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 611

Metadata

Authors
Rilling, G., & Flandrin, P.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Published
2008-01
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
85-95
ISSN
  • 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0476
OpenAlex
W2138402108
Cited by
611
References
0
FWCI
59.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: One or Two Frequencies? The Empirical Mode Decomposition Answers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsp.2007.906771
The paper
Rilling, G., & Flandrin, P. (2008). One or Two Frequencies? The Empirical Mode Decomposition Answers. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2007.906771

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.