Bayesian compressive sensing
Abstract
The data of interest are assumed to be represented as N-dimensional real vectors, and these vectors are compressible in some linear basis B, implying that the signal can be reconstructed accurately using only a small number M Lt N of basis-function coefficients associated with B. Compressive sensing is a framework whereby one does not measure one of the aforementioned N-dimensional signals directly, but rather a set of related measurements, with the new measurements a linear combination of the original underlying N-dimensional signal. The number of required compressive-sensing measurements is typically much smaller than N, offering the potential to simplify the sensing system. Let f denote the unknown underlying N-dimensional signal, and g a vector of compressive-sensing measurements, then one may approximate f accurately by utilizing knowledge of the (under-determined) linear relationship between f and g, in addition to knowledge of the fact that f is compressible in B. In this paper we employ a Bayesian formalism for estimating the underlying signal f based on compressive-sensing measurements g. The proposed framework has the following properties: i) in addition to estimating the underlying signal f, "error bars" are also estimated, these giving a measure of confidence in the inverted signal; ii) using knowledge of the error bars, a principled means is provided for determining when a sufficient number of compressive-sensing measurements have been performed; iii) this setting lends itself naturally to a framework whereby the compressive sensing measurements are optimized adaptively and hence not determined randomly; and iv) the framework accounts for additive noise in the compressive-sensing measurements and provides an estimate of the noise variance. In this paper we present the underlying theory, an associated algorithm, example results, and provide comparisons to other compressive-sensing inversion algorithms in the literature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In SBL, a parameterised prior, that is, the ARD prior, is adopted instead of a fixed prior to incorporate a preference for sparse parameters.
“In SBL, a parameterised prior, that is, the ARD prior, is adopted instead of a fixed prior to incorporate a preference for sparse parameters.”
From Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–2019 (2021) · cites this paper as [206]
An individual hyperparameter is assigned to each unknown parameter, resulting in sparse solutions.
“An individual hyperparameter is assigned to each unknown parameter, resulting in sparse solutions [204,206].”
From Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–2019 (2021) · cites this paper as [206]
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482 · see citing works
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013) · doi:10.1201/b16018 · Cited by 27,276 · see citing works
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
Caruana, R. (1997) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007379606734 · Cited by 6,636 · see citing works
Bernardo, J. M., & Smith, A. F. M. (1994) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316870 · Cited by 2,178 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hou, R., & Xia, Y. (2021) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ji, S., Xue, Y., & Carin, L.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2346-2356
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071284784
- Cited by
- 2,406
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 144 · 2021: 138 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 166 · 2018: 151 · 2017: 158 · 2016: 154 · 2015: 184 · 2014: 202 · 2013: 167 · 2012: 132
- FWCI
- 85.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
- Keywords
- compressed sensing, Bayesian inference, signal reconstruction, sparse representation, underdetermined linear systems, error bars, confidence estimation, noise variance estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review