Cited by 2,406Sparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesMathematical Analysis and Transform MethodsImage and Signal Denoising Methods

Bayesian compressive sensing

Ji, Shihao, Xue, Ya, Carin, Lawrence·2008·IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Abstract

The data of interest are assumed to be represented as N-dimensional real vectors, and these vectors are compressible in some linear basis B, implying that the signal can be reconstructed accurately using only a small number M Lt N of basis-function coefficients associated with B. Compressive sensing is a framework whereby one does not measure one of the aforementioned N-dimensional signals directly, but rather a set of related measurements, with the new measurements a linear combination of the original underlying N-dimensional signal. The number of required compressive-sensing measurements is typically much smaller than N, offering the potential to simplify the sensing system. Let f denote the unknown underlying N-dimensional signal, and g a vector of compressive-sensing measurements, then one may approximate f accurately by utilizing knowledge of the (under-determined) linear relationship between f and g, in addition to knowledge of the fact that f is compressible in B. In this paper we employ a Bayesian formalism for estimating the underlying signal f based on compressive-sensing measurements g. The proposed framework has the following properties: i) in addition to estimating the underlying signal f, "error bars" are also estimated, these giving a measure of confidence in the inverted signal; ii) using knowledge of the error bars, a principled means is provided for determining when a sufficient number of compressive-sensing measurements have been performed; iii) this setting lends itself naturally to a framework whereby the compressive sensing measurements are optimized adaptively and hence not determined randomly; and iv) the framework accounts for additive noise in the compressive-sensing measurements and provides an estimate of the noise variance. In this paper we present the underlying theory, an associated algorithm, example results, and provide comparisons to other compressive-sensing inversion algorithms in the literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsp.2007.914345

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Ji, S., Xue, Y., & Carin, L.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Published
2008-06
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
2346-2356
ISSN
1053-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071284784
Cited by
2,406
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 144 · 2021: 138 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 166 · 2018: 151 · 2017: 158 · 2016: 154 · 2015: 184 · 2014: 202 · 2013: 167 · 2012: 132
FWCI
85.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
Keywords
compressed sensing, Bayesian inference, signal reconstruction, sparse representation, underdetermined linear systems, error bars, confidence estimation, noise variance estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review