Cited by 851Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksInertial Sensor and NavigationRadar Systems and Signal Processing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Cardinality Balanced Multi-Target Multi-Bernoulli Filter and Its Implementations

Open access
Ba-Tuong Vo, Ba-Ngu Vo, Cantoni, A.·2009·IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Abstract

It is shown analytically that the multitarget multiBernoulli (MeMBer) recursion, proposed by Mahler, has a significant bias in the number of targets. To reduce the cardinality bias, a novel multiBernoulli approximation to the multi-target Bayes recursion is derived. Under the same assumptions as the MeMBer recursion, the proposed recursion is unbiased. In addition, a sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) implementation (for generic models) and a Gaussian mixture (GM) implementation (for linear Gaussian models) are proposed. The latter is also extended to accommodate mildly nonlinear models by linearization and the unscented transform.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsp.2008.2007924

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. ulmke, 2007, gaussian mixture cardinalized probability hypothesis density filter for ground moving target tracking, Proc Int Conf Information Fusion

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Space-Based Global Maritime Surveillance. Part II: Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion Techniques

    Soldi, G., Gaglione, D., Forti, N., Millefiori, L. M., Braca, P., Carniel, S., Simone, A. D., Iodice, A., Riccio, D., Daffina, F. C., et al. (2021) · IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/maes.2021.3070884 · Cited by 44

    “Existing MTT algorithms can be broadly classified as “vectortype” algorithms, such as the joint probabilistic data association (JPDA) filter [36] and the multiple hypothesis tracker (MHT) [40], [41], and “set-type” algorithms, such as the (cardinalized) probability hypothesis density filter [42]–[45] and multi-Bernoul…”
    Method

Metadata

Authors
Vo, B.-T., Vo, B.-N., & Cantoni, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Published
2009-02
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
409-423
ISSN
  • 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0476
OpenAlex
W2110354007
Cited by
851
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 21
FWCI
15.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP0878158)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Radar Systems and Signal Processing
Keywords
multi-target tracking, sequential Monte Carlo, linear Gaussian models, unscented transform, nonlinear models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review