Cited by 332Advanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesAlgebraic and Geometric AnalysisControl Systems and Identification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Quaternion LMS Algorithm for Adaptive Filtering of Hypercomplex Processes

Took, C.C., Mandic, D.P.·2009·IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Abstract

The quaternion least mean square (QLMS) algorithm is introduced for adaptive filtering of three- and four-dimensional processes, such as those observed in atmospheric modeling (wind, vector fields). These processes exhibit complex nonlinear dynamics and coupling between the dimensions, which make their component-wise processing by multiple univariate LMS, bivariate complex LMS (CLMS), or multichannel LMS (MLMS) algorithms inadequate. The QLMS accounts for these problems naturally, as it is derived directly in the quaternion domain. The analysis shows that QLMS operates inherently based on the so called ldquoaugmentedrdquo statistics, that is, both the covarianceE{xxH} and pseudocovarianceE{xxT} of the tap input vectorxare taken into account. In addition, the operation in the quaternion domain facilitates fusion of heterogeneous data sources, for instance, the three vector dimensions of the wind field and air temperature. Simulations on both benchmark and real world data support the approach.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsp.2008.2010600

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. amblard, 2004, On properness of quaternion valued random variables, Proc IMA Conf Mathematics in Signal Processing, 23
  2. mandic, 2008, Complex Valued Nonlinear Adaptive Filters A Neural Network Approach
  3. javidi, 2008, The augmented complex least mean square algorithm with application to adaptive prediction problems, IAPR Workshop Cognitive Information Processing, 54
  4. sangwine, 2005, Quaternion Toolbox for Matlab

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Took, C. C., & Mandic, D. P.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Published
2009-04
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
1316-1327
ISSN
  • 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0476
OpenAlex
W2099057098
Cited by
332
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Imperial College London
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/D061709/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Algebraic and Geometric Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
adaptive filtering, wind field estimation, atmospheric modeling, vector fields, heterogeneous data fusion, nonlinear dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review