The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complex-Valued Signal Processing: The Proper Way to Deal With Impropriety
Abstract
Complex-valued signals occur in many areas of science and engineering and are thus of fundamental interest. In the past, it has often been assumed, usually implicitly, that complex random signals are proper or circular. A proper complex random variable is uncorrelated with its complex conjugate, and a circular complex random variable has a probability distribution that is invariant under rotation in the complex plane. While these assumptions are convenient because they simplify computations, there are many cases where proper and circular random signals are very poor models of the underlying physics. When taking impropriety and noncircularity into account, the right type of processing can provide significant performance gains. There are two key ingredients in the statistical signal processing of complex-valued data: 1) utilizing the complete statistical characterization of complex-valued random signals; and 2) the optimization of real-valued cost functions with respect to complex parameters. In this overview article, we review the necessary tools, among which are widely linear transformations, augmented statistical descriptions, and Wirtinger calculus. We also present some selected recent developments in the field of complex-valued signal processing, addressing the topics of model selection, filtering, and source separation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution
Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129 · Cited by 8,986
Independent component analysis, A new concept?
Comon, P. (1994) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9 · Cited by 8,205
Independent Component Analysis
(2004) · Independent Component Analysis · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3717.003.0014 · Cited by 7,903
Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis
Hyvarinen, A. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.761722 · Cited by 6,246
Modeling by shortest data description
Rissanen, J. (1978) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(78)90005-5 · Cited by 6,011
Independent Component Analysis
Hyvärinen, A., Karhunen, J., & Oja, E. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471221317 · Cited by 5,007
WIDROW, B., & HOFF, M. E. (1960) · doi:10.21236/ad0241531 · Cited by 4,009
Metadata
- Authors
- Adali, T., Schreier, P. J., & Scharf, L. L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5101-5125
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0476
- OpenAlex
- W2159071216
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 22.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complex-Valued Signal Processing: The Proper Way to Deal With Impropriety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsp.2011.2162954
- The paper
- Adali, T., Schreier, P. J., & Scharf, L. L. (2011). Complex-Valued Signal Processing: The Proper Way to Deal With Impropriety. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2011.2162954
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.