The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diffusion Strategies Outperform Consensus Strategies for Distributed Estimation Over Adaptive Networks
Open accessAbstract
Adaptive networks consist of a collection of nodes with adaptation and learning abilities. The nodes interact with each other on a local level and diffuse information across the network to solve estimation and inference tasks in a distributed manner. In this work, we compare the mean-square performance of two main strategies for distributed estimation over networks: consensus strategies and diffusion strategies. The analysis in the paper confirms that under constant step-sizes, diffusion strategies allow information to diffuse more thoroughly through the network and this property has a favorable effect on the evolution of the network: diffusion networks are shown to converge faster and reach lower mean-square deviation than consensus networks, and their mean-square stability is insensitive to the choice of the combination weights. In contrast, and surprisingly, it is shown that consensus networks can become unstable even if all the individual nodes are stable and able to solve the estimation task on their own. When this occurs, cooperation over the network leads to a catastrophic failure of the estimation task. This phenomenon does not occur for diffusion networks: we show that stability of the individual nodes always ensures stability of the diffusion network irrespective of the combination topology. Simulation results support the theoretical findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788
Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Distributed asynchronous deterministic and stochastic gradient optimization algorithms
Tsitsiklis, J., Bertsekas, D., & Athans, M. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1986.1104412 · Cited by 1,967
Distributed Stochastic Subgradient Projection Algorithms for Convex Optimization
Sundhar Ram, S., Nedić, A., & Veeravalli, V. V. (2010) · Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications · doi:10.1007/s10957-010-9737-7 · Cited by 814
Cited by
Sayed, A. H. (2014) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2306253 · Cited by 587
Self-citationSayed, A. H., Tu, S.-Y., Chen, J., Zhao, X., & Towfic, Z. J. (2013) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2231991 · Cited by 494
Self-citationSecure distributed estimation under Byzantine attack and manipulation attack
Wan, F., Ma, T., Hua, Y., Liao, B., & Qing, X. (2022) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105384 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Tu, S.-Y., & Sayed, A. H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6217-6234
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0476
- OpenAlex
- W2024307985
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 33.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion Strategies Outperform Consensus Strategies for Distributed Estimation Over Adaptive Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsp.2012.2217338
- The paper
- Tu, S.-Y., & Sayed, A. H. (2012). Diffusion Strategies Outperform Consensus Strategies for Distributed Estimation Over Adaptive Networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2012.2217338
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.