The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smooth PARAFAC Decomposition for Tensor Completion
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, low-rank based tensor completion, which is a higher order extension of matrix completion, has received considerable attention. However, the low-rank assumption is not sufficient for the recovery of visual data, such as color and 3D images, when the ratio of missing data is extremely high. In this paper, we consider “smoothness” constraints as well as low-rank approximations and propose an efficient algorithm for performing tensor completion that is particularly powerful regarding visual data. The proposed method admits significant advantages, owing to the integration of smooth PARAFAC decomposition for incomplete tensors and the efficient selection of models in order to minimize the tensor rank. Thus, our proposed method is termed as “smooth PARAFAC tensor completion (SPC).” In order to impose the smoothness constraints, we employ two strategies, total variation (SPC-TV) and quadratic variation (SPC-QV), and invoke the corresponding algorithms for model learning. Extensive experimental evaluations on both synthetic and real-world visual data illustrate the significant improvements of our method, in terms of both prediction performance and efficiency, compared with many state-of-the-art tensor completion methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms
Rudin, L. I., Osher, S., & Fatemi, E. (1992) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f · Cited by 15,704
Tensor Decompositions and Applications
Kolda, T. G., & Bader, B. W. (2009) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/07070111x · Cited by 10,301
Parallel and Distributed Computation: Numerical Methods
Bertsekas, D. P., & Tsitsiklis, J. N. (1989) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 5,293
Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J.-J. (1970) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310791 · Cited by 4,678
Missing Value Estimation Methods for DNA Microarrays
Troyanskaya, O., Cantor, M., Sherlock, G., Brown, P., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Botstein, D., & Altman, R. B. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.6.520 · Cited by 4,230
Guaranteed Minimum-Rank Solutions of Linear Matrix Equations via Nuclear Norm Minimization
Recht, B., Fazel, M., & Parrilo, P. A. (2010) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/070697835 · Cited by 3,471
Region Filling and Object Removal by Exemplar-Based Image Inpainting
Criminisi, A., Perez, P., & Toyama, K. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2004.833105 · Cited by 3,258 · cited 1×
“F”
Harshman, R. A. (1970) · Cited by 2,255
Kuybeda, O., Frank, G. A., Bartesaghi, A., Borgnia, M., Subramaniam, S., & Sapiro, G. (2013) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2012.10.010 · Cited by 2,162
Metadata
- Authors
- Yokota, T., Zhao, Q., & Cichocki, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
- Published
- 2016-10-15
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 5423-5436
- ISSN
- 1053-587X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0476
- OpenAlex
- W1568416770
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smooth PARAFAC Decomposition for Tensor Completion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsp.2016.2586759
- The paper
- Yokota, T., Zhao, Q., & Cichocki, A. (2016). Smooth PARAFAC Decomposition for Tensor Completion. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2016.2586759
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.