The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guaranteed Minimum-Rank Solutions of Linear Matrix Equations via Nuclear Norm Minimization
Open accessAbstract
The affine rank minimization problem consists of finding a matrix of minimum rank that satisfies a given system of linear equality constraints. Such problems have appeared in the literature of a diverse set of fields including system identification and control, Euclidean embedding, and collaborative filtering. Although specific instances can often be solved with specialized algorithms, the general affine rank minimization problem is NP-hard because it contains vector cardinality minimization as a special case. In this paper, we show that if a certain restricted isometry property holds for the linear transformation defining the constraints, the minimum-rank solution can be recovered by solving a convex optimization problem, namely, the minimization of the nuclear norm over the given affine space. We present several random ensembles of equations where the restricted isometry property holds with overwhelming probability, provided the codimension of the subspace is sufficiently large. The techniques used in our analysis have strong parallels in the compressed sensing framework. We discuss how affine rank minimization generalizes this preexisting concept and outline a dictionary relating concepts from cardinality minimization to those of rank minimization. We also discuss several algorithmic approaches to minimizing the nuclear norm and illustrate our results with numerical examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
Exact Reconstruction of Sparse Signals via Nonconvex Minimization
Chartrand, R. (2007) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2007.898300 · Cited by 1,277
Cited by
Exact Matrix Completion via Convex Optimization
Candès, E. J., & Recht, B. (2009) · Foundations of Computational Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10208-009-9045-5 · Cited by 4,877
Self-citationWright, S. J. (2015) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-015-0892-3 · Cited by 1,438
Compressed Sensing Off the Grid
Tang, G., Bhaskar, B. N., Shah, P., & Recht, B. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2013.2277451 · Cited by 1,163
Self-citationAn accelerated gradient method for trace norm minimization
Ji, S., & Ye, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1553374.1553434 · Cited by 517
Interior-Point Method for Nuclear Norm Approximation with Application to System Identification
Liu, Z., & Vandenberghe, L. (2010) · SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1137/090755436 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Recht, B., Fazel, M., & Parrilo, P. A.
- Venue
- SIAM Review
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 471-501
- ISSN
- 0036-1445 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7200
- OpenAlex
- W2118550318
- Cited by
- 3,471
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 184.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guaranteed Minimum-Rank Solutions of Linear Matrix Equations via Nuclear Norm Minimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/070697835
- The paper
- Recht, B., Fazel, M., & Parrilo, P. A. (2010). Guaranteed Minimum-Rank Solutions of Linear Matrix Equations via Nuclear Norm Minimization. SIAM Review. https://doi.org/10.1137/070697835
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.