Cited by 6Advanced Wireless Network OptimizationSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resource Allocation of eMBB and URLLC Traffic using Pre-emption Mechanism

Engin, Ege, Hökelek, Ibrahim, Çırpan, Hakan Ali·2023·2023 46th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP)

Abstract

5G and beyond networks accommodate eMBB service for high throughput needs while URLLC service provides stringent latency and reliability requirements with relatively small packet sizes. In this paper, we study resource allocation for jointly considering the requirements of eMBB and URLLC services, where codeblock group-based transmission and preemption mechanisms in 5G NR standards are utilized. The proposed algorithm, which is called Patient and Intelligent Pre-Empter (PIPE), waits for a suitable symbol time to pre-empt an eMBB traffic for scheduling URLLC traffic. The selection of punctured eMBB packets is done intelligently to minimize the eMBB throughput degradation using puncture allowance rates from error coding schemes. Simulation results show that the eMBB throughput is maximized by sufficiently delaying the scheduling of URLLC traffic without violating its delay constraint.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsp59544.2023.10197688

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The priority assumption can be supported by mechanisms developed for 5G, such as network slicing or preemption techniques.

    “This priority assumption can be supported by mechanisms developed for 5G, such as network slicing or preemption techniques.”

    From Cross-layer latency analysis for 5G NR in V2X communications (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 0, 3GPP TS 38 212 - NR Multiplexing and channel coding v17 4
  2. 0, 3GPP TS 38 214 NR Physical layer procedures for data
  3. xia, 2020, Verticals URLLC Use Cases and Requirements

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Engin, E., Hökelek, I., & Çırpan, H. A.
Affiliations
  • Istanbul Technical University (TR)
  • Istanbul Technical University,Electronics and Communication Engineering Department,Istanbul,Turkey
Venue
2023 46th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-07-12
Pages
129-133
OpenAlex
W4385577214
Cited by
6
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4
FWCI
2.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP) (publishedVersion)
  • Istanbul Technical University Academic Open Archive (Istanbul Technical University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
Keywords
resource allocation, enhanced mobile broadband, ultra-reliable low-latency communication, 5G NR, delay constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review