The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey of MRI-based brain tumor segmentation methods
Open accessAbstract
Brain tumor segmentation aims to separate the different tumor tissues such as active cells, necrotic core, and edema from normal brain tissues of White Matter (WM), Gray Matter (GM), and Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF). MRI-based brain tumor segmentation studies are attracting more and more attention in recent years due to non-invasive imaging and good soft tissue contrast of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) images. With the development of almost two decades, the innovative approaches applying computer-aided techniques for segmenting brain tumor are becoming more and more mature and coming closer to routine clinical applications. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview for MRI-based brain tumor segmentation methods. Firstly, a brief introduction to brain tumors and imaging modalities of brain tumors is given. Then, the preprocessing operations and the state of the art methods of MRI-based brain tumor segmentation are introduced. Moreover, the evaluation and validation of the results of MRI-based brain tumor segmentation are discussed. Finally, an objective assessment is presented and future developments and trends are addressed for MRI-based brain tumor segmentation methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies
Bauer, S., Wiest, R., Nolte, L.-P., & Reyes, M. (2013) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/r97 · Cited by 1,036
Generalized Overlap Measures for Evaluation and Validation in Medical Image Analysis
Crum, W. R., Camara, O., & Hill, D. L. G. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.880587 · Cited by 776
Decision Forests for Tissue-Specific Segmentation of High-Grade Gliomas in Multi-channel MR
Zikic, D., Glocker, B., Konukoglu, E., Criminisi, A., Demiralp, C., Shotton, J., Thomas, O. M., Das, T., Jena, R., & Price, S. J. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33454-2_46 · Cited by 276
Cited by
Review of MRI-based brain tumor image segmentation using deep learning methods
Işın, A., Direkoğlu, C., & Şah, M. (2016) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.407 · Cited by 766
Bahadure, N. B., Ray, A. K., & Thethi, H. P. (2017) · International Journal of Biomedical Imaging · doi:10.1155/2017/9749108 · Cited by 616
Abd-Ellah, M. K., Awad, A. I., Khalaf, A. A. M., & Hamed, H. F. A. (2019) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.028 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Li, M., Wang, J., Wu, F., Liu, T., & Pan, Y.
- Venue
- Tsinghua Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Tsinghua University Press
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 578-595
- ISSN
- 1007-0214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1815337875
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey of MRI-based brain tumor segmentation methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tst.2014.6961028
- The paper
- Liu, J., Li, M., Wang, J., Wu, F., Liu, T., & Pan, Y. (2014). A survey of MRI-based brain tumor segmentation methods. Tsinghua Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/tst.2014.6961028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
