The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using Data-Mining Approaches for Wind Turbine Power Curve Monitoring: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Four data-mining approaches for wind turbine power curve monitoring are compared. Power curve monitoring can be applied to evaluate the turbine power output and detect deviations, causing financial loss. In this research, cluster center fuzzy logic, neural network, andk-nearest neighbor models are built and their performance compared against literature. Recently developed adaptive neuro-fuzzy-interference system models are set up and their performance compared with the other models, using the same data. Literature models often neglect the influence of the ambient temperature and the wind direction. The ambient temperature can influence the power output up to 20%. Nearby obstacles can lower the power output for certain wind directions. The approaches proposed in literature and the ANFIS models are compared by using wind speed only and two additional inputs. The comparison is based on the mean absolute error, root mean squared error, mean absolute percentage error, and standard deviation using data coming from three pitch regulated turbines rating 2 MW each. The ability to highlight performance deviations is investigated by use of real measurements. The comparison shows the decrease of error rates and of the ANFIS models when taking into account the two additional inputs and the ability to detect faults earlier.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Machine learning methods for wind turbine condition monitoring: A review
Stetco, A., Dinmohammadi, F., Zhao, X., Robu, V., Flynn, D., Barnes, M., Keane, J., & Nenadic, G. (2019) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.047 · Cited by 831
Using SCADA data for wind turbine condition monitoring – a review
Tautz‐Weinert, J., & Watson, S. J. (2017) · IET Renewable Power Generation · doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0248 · Cited by 458
Design, modelling, simulation and integration of cyber physical systems: Methods and applications
Hehenberger, P., Vogel-Heuser, B., Bradley, D., Eynard, B., Tomiyama, T., & Achiche, S. (2016) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2016.05.006 · Cited by 312
Self-citationCondition Monitoring of Wind Turbine Generators Using SCADA Data Analysis
Jin, X., Xu, Z., & Qiao, W. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1109/tste.2020.2989220 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlechtingen, M., Santos, I. F., & Achiche, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 671-679
- ISSN
- 1949-3029 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-3037
- OpenAlex
- W2024027437
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Data-Mining Approaches for Wind Turbine Power Curve Monitoring: A Comparative Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tste.2013.2241797
- The paper
- Schlechtingen, M., Santos, I. F., & Achiche, S. (2013). Using Data-Mining Approaches for Wind Turbine Power Curve Monitoring: A Comparative Study. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1109/tste.2013.2241797
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.