Optimal Operation of Distributed Energy Storage Systems to Improve Distribution Network Load and Generation Hosting Capability
Abstract
This paper proposes a strategy for optimal integration of battery energy storage systems (BESSs) to improve the load and distributed generation (DG) hosting ability of the utility grid. An effective tool that determines the optimal capacity and day-ahead operation strategy for deployment of distribution network operator (DNO)-controlled BESSs is presented. It is a cost-based multiobjective optimization strategy that considers two primary factors: 1)distribution system cost; and 2)battery cycling cost. Quantitative analyses on the benefits and tradeoffs of BESS installations are carried out considering different service options. BESS is investigated for three main service options: 1)voltage regulation; 2)loss reduction; and 3)peak reduction. The performance and benefits of the optimized BESS to control one service option exclusively or multiple services simultaneously is compared. The analysis is further extended to study the effect of installation site on the size, management strategy, and the service option. Results show that optimal integration of BESSs can realize maximum operational and cost benefits while effectively elevating the load and DG hosting capability of the network. The approach is developed using MATLAB interior-point algorithm. Simulations are conducted for the medium voltage (MV) IEEE 33 bus system and a low voltage (LV) distribution network in Western Australia studied during the Perth Solar City Trial.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Integration of DNSP-owned community BESSs can maximize the hosting capacity of the feeder while ensuring voltage levels are maintained.
“In [57], integration of DNSPowned community BESSs was applied to maximize the hosting capacity of the feeder while ensuring the voltage levels were maintained.”
From Voltage Regulation in Rooftop PV-Rich Distribution Networks: A Review and Detailed Case Study (2026) · cites this paper as [57]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Voltage Regulation in Rooftop PV-Rich Distribution Networks: A Review and Detailed Case Study
Rahman, O., Elphick, S., & Robinson, D. A. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15051074 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jayasekara, N., Masoum, M. A. S., & Wolfs, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Curtin University (AU)
- Central Queensland University (AU)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 250-261
- ISSN
- 1949-3029 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-3037
- OpenAlex
- W2209654189
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 9.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy (publishedVersion)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Keywords
- battery energy storage, distributed energy storage, hosting capacity, distribution network operation, multi-objective optimization, voltage regulation, power loss reduction, peak reduction, medium-voltage distribution networks, low-voltage distribution networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review