Energy Management Strategy in Dynamic Distribution Network Reconfiguration Considering Renewable Energy Resources and Storage
Abstract
Penetration of renewable energy sources (RESs) and electrical energy storage (EES) systems in distribution systems is increasing, and it is crucial to investigate their impact on systems' operation scheme, reliability, and security. In this paper, expected energy not supplied (EENS) and voltage stability index (VSI) of distribution networks are investigated in dynamic balanced and unbalanced distribution network reconfiguration, including RESs and EES systems. Furthermore, due to the high investment cost of the EES systems, the number of charge and discharge is limited, and the state-of-health constraint is included in the underlying problem to prolong the lifetime of these facilities. The optimal charging/discharging scheme for EES systems and optimal distribution network topology are presented in order to optimize the operational costs, and reliability and security indices simultaneously. The proposed strategy is applied to a large-scale 119-bus distribution test network in order to show the economic justification of the proposed approach.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Numerous examples of customer-owned distributed (behind-the-metre) energy storage devices are documented in the literature.
“Numerous examples of customer-owned distributed (behind the metre) ES devices are documented in references [51][52][53][54].”
From Voltage Regulation in Rooftop PV-Rich Distribution Networks: A Review and Detailed Case Study (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Voltage Regulation in Rooftop PV-Rich Distribution Networks: A Review and Detailed Case Study
Rahman, O., Elphick, S., & Robinson, D. A. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15051074 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Azizivahed, A., Arefi, A., Ghavidel, S., Shafie-khah, M., Li, L., Zhang, J., & Catalao, J. P. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Murdoch University (AU)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 662-673
- ISSN
- 1949-3029 (ISSN-L)
- 1949-3037
- OpenAlex
- W4255965682
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- International Science and Technology Cooperation Project of Sichuan Province China (2018HH0146)
- FEDER funds through COMPETE 2020
- Portuguese funds (SAICT-PAC/0004/2015, UID/EEA/50014/2019, 02/SAICT/2017)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Keywords
- distribution network reconfiguration, renewable energy, energy storage systems, expected energy not supplied, voltage stability index, unbalanced distribution systems, charging and discharging scheduling, operational cost minimization, distribution network reliability, energy management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review