Regrouping and echelon utilization of retired lithium-ion batteries based on a novel support vector clustering approach
Abstract
To avoid severe resource waste and environmental pollution problems, research on the retirement of power lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) for electric vehicles (EVs) has attracted significant attention. Echelon utilization is one of the most prevailing strategies to solve the problems of reusing retired LIBs. In this article, we present a clustering and regrouping framework for retired LIBs based on a novel equal-number support vector clustering (SVC) approach, which provides a new perspective to address above problems. First, we extract the feature parameters used in clustering [including capacity, internal resistance, and remaining useful life (RUL)] and quickly screen out batteries without echelon utilization value. Then, based on the results of SVC, an equal-number clustering strategy is proposed. The consistency within the battery pack after using equal-number SVC approach has been significantly improved, and the battery pack can be directly applied to the different echelon utilization scenarios. Finally, based on the public dataset, 60 batteries equally divided into four clusters were used to verify the proposed approach. In addition, the results show that compared with the initial random grouping, the average standard deviation of capacity, internal resistance, and RUL used to evaluate consistency within the group are reduced by about 1.55 times, 1.53 times, and 3.27 times, respectively. The variance and maximum difference within each group are also reduced. We also compare$k$-means and Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) clustering algorithms, and the results also suggest that the equal-number SVC approach is quite promising. The presented approach is of great significance for applications involving the screening and recycling of retired LIBs for EVs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The worldwide RP is predicted to surpass 600 kt by the end of 2025.
“The worldwide RP is predicted to surpass 600 kt by the end of 2025 [62].”
From Electric Vehicle Battery Supply Chain and Critical Materials: A Brief Survey of State of the Art (2023) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Li, C., Wang, N., Li, W., Li, Y., & Zhang, J.
- Affiliations
- Chongqing University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 3648-3658
- ISSN
- 2332-7782 (ISSN-L)
- 2372-2088
- OpenAlex
- W4226191683
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M683237)
- Special Funding for Postdoctoral Research Programs in Chongqing (XmT2020115)
- Science and Technology Innovation Program of “Chengdu-Chongqing Double City Economic Circle Construction” (KJCXZD2020013)
- Chongqing Technology Innovation and Application Program (cstc2020jscx-msxmX0202)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Keywords
- spent lithium-ion batteries, support vector clustering, electric vehicle batteries, battery screening, remaining useful life, battery capacity, internal resistance, battery recycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review