Cited by 6Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureSmart Grid Energy ManagementOptimal Power Flow Distribution

Online Hierarchical Aggregate Power Flexibility Characterization of EV Charging Stations With Disaggregation Feasibility Guarantee

Wang, Xiaowei, Wang, Shengyi, Du, Liang, Chen, Yue·2025·IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification

Abstract

With the increasing integration of electric vehicles (EVs), there is a growing recognition of the contribution of EVs to the flexibility of distribution networks. However, quantitative methods for precisely assessing the flexibility that EVs can provide to the upstream power grid have not been fully explored. To fill the research gap, this paper proposes an online hierarchical aggregate flexibility characterization method, which considers the distinct roles of distribution system operator (DSO) and charging station operators (CSOs). Under this framework, each CSO first characterizes the aggregate EV power flexibility of its charging station as a time-decoupled flexibility region. We prove that any trajectory within the region can be disaggregated into feasible individual EV charging strategies. Upon receiving the aggregate EV power flexibility regions submitted by all CSOs, the DSO solves an optimization problem to derive the aggregate power flexibility region of the distribution network, and we also prove that any power level within this region can be disaggregated into a feasible solution satisfying the network constraints. Furthermore, to account for the impact of the latest dispatch order on future EV power flexibility, real-time feedback is designed and integrated into the hierarchical framework. Numerical experiments on a multi-phase distribution network with 123 buses demonstrate the effectiveness and advantages of the proposed method. It is worth noting that the propo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tte.2025.3593904

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Wang, X., Wang, S., Du, L., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Arkansas at Little Rock (US)
  • Villanova University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification
Published
2025-12
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
13274-13286
ISSN
  • 2332-7782 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2088
OpenAlex
W4412747812
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52307144)
  • U.S. National Science Foundation (2238414)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Keywords
electric vehicle charging stations, distribution network flexibility, distribution system operators, charging station operators, online optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review