The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery
Open accessAbstract
It is well-known that speckle is a multiplicative noise that degrades the visual evaluation in ultrasound imaging. The recent advancements in ultrasound instrumentation and portable ultrasound devices necessitate the need of more robust despeckling techniques for enhanced ultrasound medical imaging for both routine clinical practice and teleconsultation. The objective of this work was to carry out a comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering based on texture analysis, image quality evaluation metrics, and visual evaluation by medical experts in the assessment of 440 (220 asymptomatic and 220 symptomatic) ultrasound images of the carotid artery bifurcation. In this paper a total of 10 despeckle filters were evaluated based on local statistics, median filtering, pixel homogeneity, geometric filtering, homomorphic filtering, anisotropic diffusion, nonlinear coherence diffusion, and wavelet filtering. The results of this study suggest that the first order statistics filter lsmv, gave the best performance, followed by the geometric filter gf4d, and the homogeneous mask area filter lsminsc. These filters improved the class separation between the asymptomatic and the symptomatic classes based on the statistics of the extracted texture features, gave only a marginal improvement in the classification success rate, and improved the visual assessment carried out by the two experts. More specifically, filters lsmv or gf4d can be used for despeckling asymptomatic images in which the expert is interested mainly in the plaque composition and texture analysis; and filters lsmv, gf4d, or lsminsc can be used for the despeckling of symptomatic images in which the expert is interested in identifying the degree of stenosis and the plaque borders. The proper selection of a despeckle filter is very important in the enhancement of ultrasonic imaging of the carotid artery. Further work is needed to evaluate at a larger scale and in clinical practice the performance of the proposed despeckle filters in the automated segmentation, texture analysis, and classification of carotid ultrasound imaging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion
Perona, P., & Malik, J. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.56205 · Cited by 12,119
De-noising by soft-thresholding
Donoho, D. L. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.382009 · Cited by 9,619
A universal image quality index
Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. C. (2002) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/97.995823 · Cited by 5,757
Davies, A., & Fennessy, P. (2001) · Digital Imaging for Photographers · doi:10.1016/b978-0-240-51590-8.50007-x · Cited by 4,371
Digital Image Enhancement and Noise Filtering by Use of Local Statistics
Lee, J.-S. (1980) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1980.4766994 · Cited by 2,728
Some fundamental properties of speckle*
Goodman, J. W. (1976) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.66.001145 · Cited by 2,125
Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion
Yu, Y., & Acton, S. T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2002.804276 · Cited by 1,850
A Comparative Study of Texture Measures for Terrain Classification
Weszka, J. S., Dyer, C. R., & Rosenfeld, A. (1976) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1976.5408777 · Cited by 1,522
Cited by
Panayides, A. S., Pattichis, M. S., Pantziaris, M., Constantinides, A. G., & Pattichis, C. S. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2965325 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Loizou, C. P., Pattichis, C. S., Christodoulou, C. I., Istepanian, R. S. H., Pantziaris, M., & Nicolaides, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1653-1669
- ISSN
- 0885-3010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069691746
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 13.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tuffc.2005.1561621
- The paper
- Loizou, C. P., Pattichis, C. S., Christodoulou, C. I., Istepanian, R. S. H., Pantziaris, M., & Nicolaides, A. (2005). Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2005.1561621
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.