The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion
Abstract
This paper provides the derivation of speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion (SRAD), a diffusion method tailored to ultrasonic and radar imaging applications. SRAD is the edge-sensitive diffusion for speckled images, in the same way that conventional anisotropic diffusion is the edge-sensitive diffusion for images corrupted with additive noise. We first show that the Lee and Frost filters can be cast as partial differential equations, and then we derive SRAD by allowing edge-sensitive anisotropic diffusion within this context. Just as the Lee and Frost filters utilize the coefficient of variation in adaptive filtering, SRAD exploits the instantaneous coefficient of variation, which is shown to be a function of the local gradient magnitude and Laplacian operators. We validate the new algorithm using both synthetic and real linear scan ultrasonic imagery of the carotid artery. We also demonstrate the algorithm performance with real SAR data. The performance measures obtained by means of computer simulation of carotid artery images are compared with three existing speckle reduction schemes. In the presence of speckle noise, speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion excels over the traditional speckle removal filters and over the conventional anisotropic diffusion method in terms of mean preservation, variance reduction, and edge localization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Cited by
Ultrasound image segmentation: a survey
Noble, J. A., & Boukerroui, D. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.877092 · Cited by 1,157
Automated breast ultrasound lesions detection using convolutional neural networks
Yap, M. H., Pons, G., Martí, J., Ganau, S., Sentís, M., Zwiggelaar, R., Davison, A. K., & Martí, R. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2017.2731873 · Cited by 1,086
Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery
Loizou, C. P., Pattichis, C. S., Christodoulou, C. I., Istepanian, R. S. H., Pantziaris, M., & Nicolaides, A. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2005.1561621 · Cited by 323
Automatic breast ultrasound image segmentation: a survey
Xian, M., Zhang, Y., Cheng, H. D., Xu, F., Zhang, B., & Ding, J. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2018.02.012 · Cited by 284
“[148], 2013 GDMs F 861 Region-based GDM and solve the inhomogeneity problem better Slow and sensitive to initialization”
BackgroundInfluentialReview of Photoacoustic Flow Imaging: Its Current State and Its Promises
van den Berg, P. J., Daoudi, K., & Steenbergen, W. (2015) · Photoacoustics · doi:10.1016/j.pacs.2015.08.001 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, Y., & Acton, S. T.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1260-1270
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130094715
- Cited by
- 1,850
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2002.804276
- The paper
- Yu, Y., & Acton, S. T. (2002). Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2002.804276
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.