Characterizing Frequency Stability Measurements Having Multiple Data Gaps
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Time series measurements with data gaps (dead times) prevent accurate computations of frequency stability variances such as the Allan variance (AVAR) and its square-root the Allan deviation (ADEV). To extract frequency distributions, time-series data must be sequentially ordered and equally spaced. Data gaps, particularly large ones, make ADEV estimates unreliable. Gap imputation by interpolation, zero-padding, or adjoining live segments, all fail in various ways. We have devised an algorithm that fills gaps by imputing an extension of preceding live data and explaining its advantages. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm, we have implemented it on 513-length original datasets and have removed 30% (150 values). The resulting data is consistent with the original in all three major criteria: the noise characteristic, the distribution, and the ADEV levels and slopes. Of special importance is that all ADEV measurements on the imputed dataset lie within 90% confidence of the statistic for the original dataset.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The terms of the frequency statistical error mainly include outliers, drift, frequency noise, and so on, which will affect the accuracy of the height measurement.
“The terms of the frequency statistical error mainly include outliers, drift, frequency noise, and so on, which will affect the accuracy of the height measurement [40,41].”
From Performance Evaluation and Requirement Analysis for Chronometric Leveling with High-Accuracy Optical Clocks (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Outliers can be eliminated by the rheinda rule and frequency drift can be corrected by linear fitting and other methods.
“The outliers can be eliminated by the rheinda rule and the frequency drift can be corrected by linear fitting and other methods [40].”
From Performance Evaluation and Requirement Analysis for Chronometric Leveling with High-Accuracy Optical Clocks (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xiong, C., Liu, D., Wu, L., Bao, L., & Zhang, P. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14174141 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Howe, D. A., & Schlossberger, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 468-472
- ISSN
- 0885-3010 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-8955
- OpenAlex
- W4200423199
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- University of Colorado
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
- Keywords
- frequency stability, data gaps, Allan deviation, Allan variance, frequency distribution, time series, frequency stability measurement
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review