The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlinear Observers for Predicting State-of-Charge and State-of-Health of Lead-Acid Batteries for Hybrid-Electric Vehicles
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes the application of state-estimation techniques for the real-time prediction of the state-of-charge (SoC) and state-of-health (SoH) of lead-acid cells. Specifically, approaches based on the well-known Kalman Filter (KF) and Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), are presented, using a generic cell model, to provide correction for offset, drift, and long-term state divergence-an unfortunate feature of more traditional coulomb-counting techniques. The underlying dynamic behavior of each cell is modeled using two capacitors (bulk and surface) and three resistors (terminal, surface, and end), from which the SoC is determined from the voltage present on the bulk capacitor. Although the structure of the model has been previously reported for describing the characteristics of lithium-ion cells, here it is shown to also provide an alternative to commonly employed models of lead-acid cells when used in conjunction with a KF to estimate SoC and an EKF to predict state-of-health (SoH). Measurements using real-time road data are used to compare the performance of conventional integration-based methods for estimating SoC with those predicted from the presented state estimation schemes. Results show that the proposed methodologies are superior to more traditional techniques, with accuracy in determining the SoC within 2% being demonstrated. Moreover, by accounting for the nonlinearities present within the dynamic cell model, the application of an EKF is shown to provide verifiable indications of SoH of the cell pack.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
Huet, F. (1998) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/s0378-7753(97)02665-7 · Cited by 593
Cited by
Waag, W., Fleischer, C., & Sauer, D. U. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.064 · Cited by 1,059
Sun, F., Hu, X., Zou, Y., & Li, S. (2011) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.059 · Cited by 614
State of Charge and State of Health Estimation for Lithium Batteries Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Chaoui, H., & Ibe-Ekeocha, C. C. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2017.2715333 · Cited by 555
Farmann, A., Waag, W., Marongiu, A., & Sauer, D. U. (2015) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.129 · Cited by 472
Liu, D., Pang, J., Zhou, J., Peng, Y., & Pecht, M. (2013) · Microelectronics Reliability · doi:10.1016/j.microrel.2013.03.010 · Cited by 443
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhangu, B. S., Bentley, P., Stone, D. A., & Bingham, C. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 783-794
- ISSN
- 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108084892
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear Observers for Predicting State-of-Charge and State-of-Health of Lead-Acid Batteries for Hybrid-Electric Vehicles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tvt.2004.842461
- The paper
- Bhangu, B. S., Bentley, P., Stone, D. A., & Bingham, C. M. (2005). Nonlinear Observers for Predicting State-of-Charge and State-of-Health of Lead-Acid Batteries for Hybrid-Electric Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2004.842461
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.