Cited by 135Engineering and Test SystemsBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceFault Detection and Control Systems

Automated Diagnosis for UMTS Networks Using Bayesian Network Approach

Khanafer, R.M., Solana, B., Triola, J., Barco, R., Moltsen, L., Altman, Z., Lazaro, P.·2008·IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Abstract

This paper presents an automated diagnosis in troubleshooting (TS) for Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) networks using a Bayesian network (BN) approach. An automated diagnosis model is first described using the Naive Bayesian Classifier. To increase the performance of the diagnosis model, the entropy minimization discretization (EMD) method is incorporated into the model to select optimal segments for the discretization of the input symptoms. In the first phase, the diagnosis model is constructed using a dynamic simulator. The simulator TS platform allows generation of a large amount of data required to study the relations between faults and symptoms. In the second phase, the diagnosis model is adapted to a real UMTS network using counters and key performance indicators (KPIs) recovered from an Operations and Maintenance Center (OMC). Results for the automated diagnosis using both network simulator and real UMTS network measurements illustrate the efficiency of the proposed TS approach and its importance to mobile network operators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tvt.2007.912610

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khanafer, R. M., Solana, B., Triola, J., Barco, R., Moltsen, L., Altman, Z., & Lazaro, P.
Affiliations
  • Orange (France) (FR)
  • Telefonica Research and Development (ES)
  • Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
Published
2008-07
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
2451-2461
ISSN
  • 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9359
OpenAlex
W2153849055
Cited by
135
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Engineering and Test Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
automated diagnosis, UMTS networks, Bayesian networks, network troubleshooting, naive Bayesian classifier, fault diagnosis, key performance indicators, operation and maintenance, mobile operators, network simulator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review